1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-8146(97)00183-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of non-toxic and toxic varieties of Jatropha curcas for chemical composition, digestibility, protein degradability and toxic factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

21
247
6
16

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(290 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
21
247
6
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The total phenols and total tannins values are similar to those reported by Makkar et al (1998), but the content of condensed tannins is different from those observed by the same authors, that evaluating toxic and nontoxic varieties of Jatropha curcas not found condensed tannins in both varieties. It is important noting that there are factors that affect the tannin concentration in plants, among which stand out climate, plant mineral nutrition and growth stage (Waterman and Mole, 1994).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total phenols and total tannins values are similar to those reported by Makkar et al (1998), but the content of condensed tannins is different from those observed by the same authors, that evaluating toxic and nontoxic varieties of Jatropha curcas not found condensed tannins in both varieties. It is important noting that there are factors that affect the tannin concentration in plants, among which stand out climate, plant mineral nutrition and growth stage (Waterman and Mole, 1994).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Chivandi et al (2006), evaluating the effect of different methods of detoxification in the Jatropha curcas meal with 0.8 mg/g of phorbol esters, observed significant losses in pigs blood parameters. The phorbol esters mimic the Diacylglycerol (DAG) action, inactivating the protein kinase C, which regulates different pathways signal of translation and other metabolic activities by acting as co-carcinogen and causing cellular and biochemical effects in many different animal species (Goel et al, 2007) and studied extensively in different animal models like goats, sheep, mice, rats and fish when fed with phorbol estercontaining feeds (Adam and Magzoub, 1975;Makkar et al, 1998). The phorbol esters content depends on the oil residue present on pie or meal after the processing (Rakshit et al, 2008), which justifies the values obtained in this study, since this is a specific research and the oil was almost completely extracted to obtain the meal and this passed over by the detoxification process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) were found to be highly susceptible to phorbol esters present in the seed meal of All data are on a dry-matter basis; source: Makkar et al (1998a).…”
Section: Plants Containing Multibioactive Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zootec., v.62, n.5, p.1255-1258, 2010 possibilidades de uso na alimentação animal. Entretanto, um dos principais inconvenientes da utilização de resíduos do pinhão-manso na alimentação animal é a presença de fatores antinutricionais (fitatos e inibidores de tripsina) e de princípios tóxicos (ésteres de forbol e curcina) (Gubitz et al, 1999;Makkar et al, 1998). No entanto, a torta de pinhão-manso, após detoxificada, pode ser também utilizada na alimentação animal.…”
unclassified
“…Makkar et al (1998), a baixa aceitação da planta como alimento seria devido à presença dos ésteres de forbol que estão presentes em elevadas quantidades nas variedades tóxicas de pinhão-manso. Os ésteres de forbol têm sido relacionados com alterações biológicas, como vômito, diarreia, tonturas, promoção de tumores, ativação plaquetária, aumento da mitogênese linfocítica e da resposta inflamatória, degranulação de neutrófilos, redução da fertilidade e reabsorção fetal (Goonasekera et al, 1995;Hass e Mittelbach, 2000).…”
unclassified