2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00337-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception in Nigerians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
54
1
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
54
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In a World Health Organization (WHO) large randomized controlled trial (RCT) of these methods, delaying the first dose by 12 h increased the odds of pregnancy by almost 50% (Piaggio et al, 1999). In our study, the contraceptive efficacy of E-LNG-ECP was 95.3%, and the failure rate was 0.2%, significantly lower than failure rates in the RCTs of LNG conducted by WHO and other researchers (Ho et al, 1993; Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation,1998; Piaggio et al, 1999;Wu et al, 1999;Arowojolu et al, 2002;von Hertzen H et al, 2002;Ngai et al, 2005) (see Supplementary data, Table SI) In our study, 82.7% of participants took the drug during the first 24 h after unprotected intercourse, while only 42 -46% did so in the WHO RCT (von Hertzen H et al, 2002). Another study showed that the failure rates of ECPs during the first 24 h, 24 -48 h and 48 -72 h were 0.4, 1.2 and 2.7%, respectively (WHO, 1998).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…In a World Health Organization (WHO) large randomized controlled trial (RCT) of these methods, delaying the first dose by 12 h increased the odds of pregnancy by almost 50% (Piaggio et al, 1999). In our study, the contraceptive efficacy of E-LNG-ECP was 95.3%, and the failure rate was 0.2%, significantly lower than failure rates in the RCTs of LNG conducted by WHO and other researchers (Ho et al, 1993; Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation,1998; Piaggio et al, 1999;Wu et al, 1999;Arowojolu et al, 2002;von Hertzen H et al, 2002;Ngai et al, 2005) (see Supplementary data, Table SI) In our study, 82.7% of participants took the drug during the first 24 h after unprotected intercourse, while only 42 -46% did so in the WHO RCT (von Hertzen H et al, 2002). Another study showed that the failure rates of ECPs during the first 24 h, 24 -48 h and 48 -72 h were 0.4, 1.2 and 2.7%, respectively (WHO, 1998).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Clinical effectiveness trials have found that LNG EC is more effective than the Yuzpe EC regimen (1,2). The actual effectiveness of LNG EC has been estimated between 58% and 95% under different delays in administration (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). In some of the studies, a decrease of effectiveness with delay was noted, in others not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le taux d'échec global observé dans l'enquête que nous décrivons est similaire à ceux qui ont été publiés à partir d'étu-des en population générale [8][9][10] et légèrement supérieur à ceux observés dans des études cliniques strictement contrô-lées [3,11,14]. Dans cette enquête, 34 femmes (6,6 %) ont demandé la contraception d'urgence plus de 72 heures après un rapport sexuel non ou mal protégé.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified