2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of two automated systems for nucleic acid extraction of BK virus: NucliSens easyMAG versus BioRobot MDx

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of a commercial DNA extraction procedure (Qiagen Bio-Sprint 96 one-for-all vet kit) gave high sensitivity as well as highthroughput capacity in a diagnostic laboratory setting. Magnetic bead DNA purification methods generally lead to lower carryover of contaminants or potential PCR inhibitors from a sample, as the method involves the physical removal of the DNA from the remainder of the sample (31)(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a commercial DNA extraction procedure (Qiagen Bio-Sprint 96 one-for-all vet kit) gave high sensitivity as well as highthroughput capacity in a diagnostic laboratory setting. Magnetic bead DNA purification methods generally lead to lower carryover of contaminants or potential PCR inhibitors from a sample, as the method involves the physical removal of the DNA from the remainder of the sample (31)(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The insufficient removal of PCR inhibitors was recently reported to be an issue when detection rates of BK virus in urine specimens after extraction on automated extraction platforms were compared. 23 For this study, it should be mentioned that the assay that had been used for pretesting may present as a minor and unavoidable weakness in the study design. When results obtained for the detection of CMV DNA after extraction on automated extraction platforms were compared, less than two-thirds of the samples analyzed gave positive results with all platforms studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiratory virus multiplex PCR should then be performed, and the positive rate of extraction and Ct values of the target viral gene and internal control (IC) for the proposed reagent should be compared with those for the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit extraction reagent. Although there are no definitive criteria for assessment, a reagent is generally considered comparable in performance to that of the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit extraction reagent, if the Ct value difference is ≤1.66 of 0.5 log 10 copies/mL equivalents [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: What Evaluations Are Needed For Choosing Nucleic Acid Extracmentioning
confidence: 99%