2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2005.00445.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative floral structure and systematics in Celastrales (Celastraceae, Parnassiaceae, Lepidobotryaceae)

Abstract: Floral morphology, anatomy and histology in the newly circumscribed order Celastrales, comprising Celastraceae, Parnassiaceae and Lepidobotryaceae are studied comparatively. Several genera of Celastraceae and Lepidobotrys (Lepidobotryaceae) were studied for the first time in this respect. Celastraceae are well supported as a group by floral structure (including genera that were in separate families in earlier classifications); they have dorsally bulged-up locules (and thus apical septa) and contain oxalate dru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
103
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(285 reference statements)
12
103
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Davis and Wurdack 2004), all except the last of which provided only weak branch support. However, it is consistent with Matthews and Endress' (2005) description of many morphological features that are shared between Celastrales and Malpighiales to the exclusion of Oxalidales, with only two potential morphological synapomorphies for Celastrales and Oxalidales.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Davis and Wurdack 2004), all except the last of which provided only weak branch support. However, it is consistent with Matthews and Endress' (2005) description of many morphological features that are shared between Celastrales and Malpighiales to the exclusion of Oxalidales, with only two potential morphological synapomorphies for Celastrales and Oxalidales.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Nicobariodendron is morphologically peculiar relative to other Celastraceae with its racemose inflorescences, unisexual flowers on dioecious plants, and two stamens (although none of these characteristics are unique to Nicobariodendron within the family). For a description of more typical morphological characteristics of the Celastraceae see Simmons (2004a) and Matthews and Endress (2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because such comparative studies are time-consuming and the systematic classifi cation has diff erent hierarchical levels, they can only be done in a stepwise fashion (for eudicots, e.g. Matthews and Endress, 2002, 2005a, b , 2006von Balthazar et al, 2004 ;Sch ΓΆ nenberger and Grenhagen, 2005 ;Endress and Matthews, 2006 ;Ronse De Craene and Haston, 2006 ;von Balthazar et al, 2006 ;Endress, 2008 , 2009 ;Janka et al, 2008 ;Sch ΓΆ nenberger, 2009 ;von Balthazar and Sch ΓΆ nenberger, 2009 ;Sch ΓΆ nenberger et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Π£ Hippocrateoideae ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ развиваСтся ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ³ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ€-Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ синкарпного гинСцСя, ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ сра-станиСм 3 (Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎ 2 ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 5) плодолистиков. Бинас-цидиатная Π·ΠΎΠ½Π° Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° Π² базальной части Π³ΠΈ-нСцСя (Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ Hippocratea barbata: Matthews, Endress, 2005). Π’ области завязи Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡŽΠ΄Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ 3 (Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎ 2 ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 5) Π³Π½Π΅Π·Π΄Π°, с 2-10 сСмязачатками Π² ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π³Π½Π΅Π·Π΄Π΅ (Π½Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎ сидят Π² Π΄Π²Π° ряда).…”
unclassified