2014
DOI: 10.18470/1992-1098-2011-3-65-69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative-Morphological and Ecological and Biological Analysis of Cestoda Erinaceolepis Erinacei (Gmelin, 1789) Gulyaev Et Irzhavsky COMB.N

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Four cestodes were used for detailed morphological description. There were no significant differences among our specimens of H. erinacei and those recently re-described by Irzhavsky & Ketenchiev (2011) from E. roumanicus from the Caucasus. Specimens of H. erinacei found in Lithuania were characterized by a slightly smaller scolex and proglottids (table 2) but the position and shape of the genital organs were similar to prior morphological descriptions.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Four cestodes were used for detailed morphological description. There were no significant differences among our specimens of H. erinacei and those recently re-described by Irzhavsky & Ketenchiev (2011) from E. roumanicus from the Caucasus. Specimens of H. erinacei found in Lithuania were characterized by a slightly smaller scolex and proglottids (table 2) but the position and shape of the genital organs were similar to prior morphological descriptions.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Such abnormalities have been noted in H. diminuta, H. hibernia, Hymenolepis vogeae Singh, 1956, T. mogerae and T. peipingensis (Montgomery et al ., 1987; Sawada & Koyasu, 1991; Mas-Coma & Tenora, 1997; Gulyaev & Melnikova, 2005). The shape of the fully developed uterus was one of the primary features leading to the placement of H. erinacei in the genus Erinaceolepis (Irzhavsky & Ketenchiev, 2011), but later, taking into account other morphological features, it was again relegated to Hymenolepis (Makarikov & Tkach, 2013). The morphology of the scolex and proglottids, however, and the presence of transverse anastomoses between the ventral osmoregulatory canals, and the common attributes of the eggs described herein, confirm the allocation of this species to the genus Hymenolepis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations