2006
DOI: 10.3989/scimar.2006.70n1139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative morphometrics of two populations of <em>Mugil curema</em> (Pisces: Mugilidae) on the Atlantic and Mexican Pacific coasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thomson, 1997;Camacho-Rodríguez, Lozano-Vilano, 2004), who used non-standardized measurements. Some of the linear measurements of this analysis are consistent with those used in morphological studies for some taxa of the family Mugilidae and have found to be effective for taxonomical discrimination (e.g., Ibáñez-Aguirre, Lleonart, 1996;Cousseau et al, 2005;Ibáñez-Aguirre et al, 2006;González-Castro et al, 2008Konan et al, 2014). These last authors determined for the genus Mugil that the landmarks associated to the head region had a higher discriminative power.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Thomson, 1997;Camacho-Rodríguez, Lozano-Vilano, 2004), who used non-standardized measurements. Some of the linear measurements of this analysis are consistent with those used in morphological studies for some taxa of the family Mugilidae and have found to be effective for taxonomical discrimination (e.g., Ibáñez-Aguirre, Lleonart, 1996;Cousseau et al, 2005;Ibáñez-Aguirre et al, 2006;González-Castro et al, 2008Konan et al, 2014). These last authors determined for the genus Mugil that the landmarks associated to the head region had a higher discriminative power.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…sp., and the body width at the origin of the pectoral fins (Pw) is slightly less than in other M. curema or M. rubrioculus n. sp. However, as noted above and by Ibanez‐Aguirre et al (2006), there seems to be quite large morphometric variation within Atlantic populations of M. curema . Therefore, none of the features discussed above reliably distinguish the lectotype from the other specimens of M. curema .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, neither D1w nor Pb in the M. curema lectotype is outside the total range for all examined specimens on M. curema (wide‐ and narrow‐jawed morphotypes). Moreover, the body width can be strongly influenced by sexual maturation (Ibanez‐Aguirre et al , 2006). The anal fin base (Ab) and the pelvic fins (Vl) are longer than in other wide‐jawed morphotypes of M. curema and are comparable to wide‐jawed morphotypes of M. rubrioculus n. sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher morphological variation in the specimens of M. curema especially in the Atlantic may be due to the presence of more than one population in the Gulf of Mexico or else that there are different phenotypes in the same sample (Ibáñez-Aguirre and Lleonart, 1996;Ibáñez-Aguirre et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%