Comparative Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols Using NS2 Simulator

Mohapatra, Shivajit; Kanungo, P.

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25734-6_127

Cited by 16 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If after this search, there is no route, then this is marked as unreachable or unrecoverable. 7 In our case NET TRAVERSAL TIME = 2 x NODE TRAVERSAL TIME x NET DIAMETER = 2 x (40 ms) x 5 = 400 ms = 0.4 s 8 The waiting time for the RREP corresponding to the second RREQ is 2 x NET TRA-VERSAL TIME milliseconds = 0.8 s.…”

Section: Route Establishment and Recoverymentioning

confidence: 73%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis and evaluation of the establishment and maintenance of paths in a MANET used for industrial process monitoring

Albero-Albero

Sempere-Payá

Mataix-Oltra

2013

Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ElsevierAlbero Albero, T.; Sempere Paya, VM.; Mataix Oltra, J. (2013). Analysis and evaluation of the establishment and maintenance of paths in a MANET used for industrial process monitoring. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 37:79-98. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2013.05.009. Analysis and evaluation of the establishment and maintenance of paths in a MANET used for industrial process monitoring. AbstractThe use of wireless networks is having an ever greater impact on systems controlling automation, industrial manufacturing, distributed control and supervision. Wireless technologies in particular have penetrated quickly the area of control of public utilities networks, and typical examples of this are remote control and supervision of large water, gas or electricity distribution networks. These types of networks are usually formed of a central station and different remote stations, and remote clients who are able to remotely monitor or even control the working of the system. To improve the use of the system, the remote stations must have the capacity to exchange information between each other and with the central station. The spontaneous generation of wireless networks in remote stations to exchange information between workers is a possible solution. Taking into account the characteristics of this type of monitoring system, the paper has proposed a scenario (number of nodes, area size, mobility) and has modeled, using stochastic activity networks (SAN), the operation of an ad hoc network that uses a reactive routing protocol to determine if the network is able to offer the typical services of these facilities (images or video streaming and alerts).

show abstract

Section: Route Establishment and Recoverymentioning

confidence: 73%

“…Many studies on MANETs have been based on simulation. The most popular simulation tools for ad hoc networks are OPNET, see an example in [5,6], ns-2 [7], and Glomosim, see [8]. However, these are not the only tools available to study this type of network.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis and evaluation of the establishment and maintenance of paths in a MANET used for industrial process monitoring

Albero-Albero

Sempere-Payá

Mataix-Oltra

2013

Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…S. Mohapatra et al [19], in their subsequent publication, performed a comparative assessment of AODV, DSDV, and OLSR routing protocol using NS-2. They have analyzed-throughput, packet delivery ratio & control overhead and concluded that the OLSR gives better packet delivery fraction.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulation Analysis of OLSR and Its Variant with Cooperative MPR Selection on NS-2.35 in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

Sharma¹,

Kumar²

2018

IJCNIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile Ad-Hoc networks (MANETs) can be classified as Decentralized, Independent and Self-Organizing dynamic networks of intellectual movable nodes. In such networks, devices are connected by provisional wireless links. Dynamic topology imposes challenges in developing an efficient routing protocol, for enabling successful communication between mobile devices. Based on the nature of working, proactive & reactive protocols are the two broadly classified categories of routing protocols. This paper presents, relative experimental analysis of proactive routing protocols viz., Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) and its variant with Cooperative Multi-Point Relay (MPR) Selection. To compare OLSR and its variant protocol, the Network Simulator-2.35 is used to carry out numerous simulations, on arbitrary scenarios, by varying the number of network nodes & mobility of nodes. As per the simulation outcomes, the OLSR with a cooperative MPR selection has outperformed the traditional OLSR protocol in static scenarios or when the network load has been varied. On the contrary, the traditional OLSR protocol has performed better in mobile scenarios. But, as demonstrated from various experimentations, it exhibits higher Routing Overheads as compared to its variant protocol. Further, on the basis of simulation results, efforts can be made in the direction of performance optimization of OLSR and its variant protocol, to improve its performance in highly mobile scenarios as well, keeping in view other performance metrics.

show abstract

“…In 2011, Mohapatra et al [30] studied the effect of change in network size, mobility and pause time on AODV, OLSR and DSDV. The number of nodes was fixed at 30.…”

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Routing Protocols under different Mobility Models, Node Density and Speed

Kumar

Gupta

2015

TNC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) is self-organized and decentralized network. Due to these properties, they are usable in the field of disaster management, war scenarios, vehicular network etc. To send packets from source to destination, route(s) are required; to achieve this task routing protocols are designed. Routing protocols for MANET have been grouped into four types on the basis of single channel classification. These are Proactive, Reactive, Hybrid and Location-based/ Geographic. The performance of these protocols depends on various factors including mobility pattern/model, speed of node, density of node, area, transmission range etc. In this paper the factors taken into account are mobility models, speed of node and density of node. The performance metrics includes throughput, end to end delay and packet loss. The protocols simulated are DSR, LAR, OLSR and ZRP, choosing one from each group discussed above. The mobility models employed in this study are Random Way Point, Gauss Markov, Reference Point Group Mobility and Manhattan Grid. From the results it is evident that with the change in mobility pattern, speed and density of the nodes the performance varies. Furthermore it has been observed that location based routing protocols (LAR) and OLSR shows good performance with these variations.

show abstract

Comparative Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols Using NS2 Simulator

Cited by 16 publications

References 11 publications

Analysis and evaluation of the establishment and maintenance of paths in a MANET used for industrial process monitoring

Analysis and evaluation of the establishment and maintenance of paths in a MANET used for industrial process monitoring

Simulation Analysis of OLSR and Its Variant with Cooperative MPR Selection on NS-2.35 in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

Routing Protocols under different Mobility Models, Node Density and Speed

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About