2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative performance of a licensed anthrax vaccine versus electroporation based delivery of a PA encoding DNA vaccine in rhesus macaques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of studies performed in our laboratory and by others have demonstrated that i.m. EP is a highly effective method for facilitating the uptake and expression of DNA vaccines in multiple animal species (27)(28)(29)44). In addition, i.m.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of studies performed in our laboratory and by others have demonstrated that i.m. EP is a highly effective method for facilitating the uptake and expression of DNA vaccines in multiple animal species (27)(28)(29)44). In addition, i.m.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from these models have demonstrated consistently that as few as two doses of AVA and rPA vaccines separated by 7 to 14 days can provide significant short-term protection against acute inhalation anthrax (9, 36, 55). Livingston and coworkers (27) demonstrated that 2 doses of AVA given 8 weeks apart provided 100% protection (n ϭ 5) in rhesus macaques up to 1 year after the first vaccination. In contrast, Little and coworkers (22) reported for rabbits that a 2-dose rPA-Alhydrogel formulation (0 and 4 weeks) afforded 74.1% (20/27 animals) and 37.5% (9/24 animals) protection 6 months and 12 months after the first vaccination, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the immunization via i.m. electroporation (EP) the animals were, as previously described, vaccinated with a "needle-style" EP device (TriGrid delivery system; Ichor Medical Systems, San Diego, CA) (30)(31)(32). For the i.d.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%