2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative performance of IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA for the measurement of SDMA in canine and feline serum

Abstract: Kidney disease is common in companion animals, and traditionally diagnosed with serum creatinine concentration (sCr), blood urea nitrogen, and abnormal urinalysis findings. Symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) is a novel kidney biomarker that reflects glomerular filtration rate, increasing earlier than sCr with acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. This prospective study compared accuracy and precision of two commercial SDMA assays, the IDEXX SDMA Test and the DLD SDMA ELISA, relative to the established… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimal difference in CV I between both studies is probably attributable to a small increase in biological variation over time as both studies applied the same assay and minimalized analytical variance by batch analyses of the samples at the end of the study. However, a substantial proportion of the within-subject variability is probably caused by the analytical error of the applied assay as a considerably high analytical variability ranging from 7.7% to 10% has been reported for the IDEXX SDMA test [ 19 , 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimal difference in CV I between both studies is probably attributable to a small increase in biological variation over time as both studies applied the same assay and minimalized analytical variance by batch analyses of the samples at the end of the study. However, a substantial proportion of the within-subject variability is probably caused by the analytical error of the applied assay as a considerably high analytical variability ranging from 7.7% to 10% has been reported for the IDEXX SDMA test [ 19 , 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete elimination of the analytical variance was not possible, though, due to the difference in storage length between the first and last collected samples. The second limitation is the relatively high analytical variability of the applied SDMA assay, which has been reported to be between 7.7% and 10% [ 19 , 52 , 53 ]. According to published guidelines, the CV A of an analytical method should be <0.5 CV I to have a desirable performance [ 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hematologic and biochemical analysis of blood samples revealed leukopenia (3.7 G/l; reference range 3.9-19 G/l) characterized by lymphopenia (lymphocytes 595/μl; reference range 850-5850/μl) and mild neutropenia (segmented neutrophils 2604/μl; reference range 2620-15,170/μl); mild thrombocytopenia (149 G/l; reference range 155-641 G/l); anisocytosis, and slightly increased serum levels of symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) (18 μg/dl; reference range 0-14 μg/dl) and bilirubin (0.5 mg/dl; reference range 0-0.4 mg/dl). SDMA was determined using a commercially available high-throughput immunoassay (IDEXX SDMA® Test; IDEXX Laboratories Inc.) [26]. Serum levels of calcium were slightly reduced (2.1 mmol/l; reference range 2.2-2.9 mmol/l) and magnesium was elevated (1.3 mmol/l, reference range 0.6-1.1 mmol/l).…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In March 2017, a complete blood count and serum clinical biochemical analysis (including the assessment of liver, kidney and pancreatic parameters) were performed at IDEXX reference laboratory in Ludwigsburg, Germany (Table 1 ). Symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) was measured using a commercially available high-throughput immunoassay (IDEXX SDMA Test, IDEXX Laboratories Inc.; Ernst et al 2018 ). No urine examination was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%