2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative proteomic analysis of bacterial wilt susceptible and resistant tomato cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One protein (spot 39) from the plants relating to the protein folding, namely mitochondrial chaperonin-60 was also highly expressed with the increasing years of monoculture. The chaperonins, a ubiquitous family of sequence-related molecular chaperones, are essential for protein folding under both normal and stressful conditions [50], [51]. However, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (spot 60), a protein related to the pentose phosphate pathway was down-regulated in the two-year monoculture soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One protein (spot 39) from the plants relating to the protein folding, namely mitochondrial chaperonin-60 was also highly expressed with the increasing years of monoculture. The chaperonins, a ubiquitous family of sequence-related molecular chaperones, are essential for protein folding under both normal and stressful conditions [50], [51]. However, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (spot 60), a protein related to the pentose phosphate pathway was down-regulated in the two-year monoculture soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteomics provides insight into protein localization, protein–protein interactions, enzymatic complexes or post-translational modifications that are essential to a better understanding of plant-pathogen interactions. Proteomic approaches have been used in recent years to further characterize plant interactions with viruses (Casado-Vela et al, 2006; Giribaldi et al, 2011; Li et al, 2011; Di Carli et al, 2012), bacteria (Jones et al, 2006; Afroz et al, 2009, 2013; Li et al, 2012), or fungi (Kim et al, 2004a; Geddes et al, 2008; Bhadauria et al, 2010; Mukherjee et al, 2010; Shah et al, 2012). The general picture of changes occurring in the plant-host proteome highlights common features among the broad range of interaction analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, functional approaches, including proteomics, have greatly contributed to the molecular dissection of plantepathogen interactions, allowing to identify a number of defence-related candidate proteins and helping to clarify specific gene expression patterns (Metha et al, 2008). In tomato, proteomic studies have been performed to investigate response to bacteria (Afroz et al, 2009;Dahal et al, 2010;Savidor et al, 2012), virus (Casado-Vela et al, 2006) and fungi (Houtermann et al, 2007;Mazzeo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%