2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00537-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
333
2
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 479 publications
(357 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
17
333
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the DISABKIDS specifically addresses a population with health conditions, conceptualization of HrQoL was closer to the MetabQoL 1.0. Nevertheless, due to its more specific content, we 26); not bad at all, slightly bad, medium bad, bad, very bad (item 27); never, once, twice, three to five times, six times or more (item 28) hypothesise that the MetabQoL 1.0 will be more responsive to disease-related changes than the chronic-generic DIS-ABKIDS (Wiebe et al 2003) and thus most valuable for clinical practice and research settings. This hypothesis will be followed up in long-term studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the DISABKIDS specifically addresses a population with health conditions, conceptualization of HrQoL was closer to the MetabQoL 1.0. Nevertheless, due to its more specific content, we 26); not bad at all, slightly bad, medium bad, bad, very bad (item 27); never, once, twice, three to five times, six times or more (item 28) hypothesise that the MetabQoL 1.0 will be more responsive to disease-related changes than the chronic-generic DIS-ABKIDS (Wiebe et al 2003) and thus most valuable for clinical practice and research settings. This hypothesis will be followed up in long-term studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering research, disease-specific HrQoL measures are a most interesting additional approach for measuring outcome in clinical trials (Wiebe et al 2003). The MetabQoL 1.0 is a promising tool for assessing diseaserelated HrQoL changes in IT-IEM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, it is often recommended to combine a generic instrument and a disease-specific instrument. For most diseases, the generic instruments have lower responsiveness compared to specific ones [145], but the generic measures are useful to compare the patient cohort against cohorts with other diseases or with the normal population. Third, the proof of superior QoL after one type of surgery is a strong but not a sufficient argument to use this type of surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown, at least for RCT in which a therapeutic effect was demonstrated, that specific instruments are more responsive than generic tools, supporting the idea that a combination of specific and generic instruments are useful. 13 While there are specific HRQOL instruments for several neurological diseases (e.g., epilepsy, migraine, and neuromuscular disorders), none specifically address function during an episode of illness (J. Langfitt, personal communication).…”
Section: Skeletal Musclementioning
confidence: 99%