2018
DOI: 10.1089/pho.2017.4380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Safety of Needle, EndoActivator, and Laser-Activated Irrigation in Overinstrumented Root Canals

Abstract: EAI, NI, and LAI are equally safe for irrigating canals with intact apices. However, the risk of irrigant extrusion can increase in overinstrumented canals, with EAI associated with a greater risk compared with NI and LAI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method was used previously by others. 10,28,29 In a methodological study, the extrusion pattern of irrigant obtained with the foam cube method showed good correlation with the pattern obtained by the traditional glass vial collection method. 30 Weaknesses of the study include the lack of periodontal tissue pressure, the use of a single type of tooth with straight roots only, and the performance of the experiment by a single operator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This method was used previously by others. 10,28,29 In a methodological study, the extrusion pattern of irrigant obtained with the foam cube method showed good correlation with the pattern obtained by the traditional glass vial collection method. 30 Weaknesses of the study include the lack of periodontal tissue pressure, the use of a single type of tooth with straight roots only, and the performance of the experiment by a single operator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The flow rate was standardised in eight studies using a programmable precision syringe pump with constant pressure [18, 20, 24, 28, 34, 35, 39, 41]. In nine studies, the flow rate was established using a hand‐controlled syringe to create a constant flow rate in the root canal [1, 10, 11, 29, 36–38, 40, 42]. Understandably, hand control is not entirely reliable and does not meet the required standards [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endodontic irrigants are widely used in root canal therapy because of their antiseptic and dissolution properties [8]; however, extrusion of even a minuscule concentration (0.1%) of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) can have toxic effects on periapical tissues [9]. Several factors, such as chronic periapical lesions, decreased periapical tissue resistance, loss of apical constriction, apical diameter, perforation and irrigation technique, influence extrusion [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Causing less debris extrusion may be another important factor for immature teeth in order to prevent the TAP from going beyond the apical foramen. Several studies have compared the techniques used in this study with regard to apical extrusion at mature teeth ( 14 , 44 , 45 , 46 ). Because this study proved that the irrigation techniques had similar effects with regard to TAP removal, another important factor, apical extrusion, could affect the selection of the irrigation method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%