Comparative Study of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Phase-Resolved Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography for Measurement of Retinal Blood Vessels Caliber

Abstract

PurposeTo compare the accuracy of Doppler optical coherence tomography (DOCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) for measuring retinal blood vessel caliber at different flow rates.MethodsA research-grade 1060-nm OCT system with 3.5-μm axial resolution in retinal tissue and 92,000 A scan/s image acquisition rate was used in this study. DOCT and OCTA measurements were acquired both from a flow phantom and in vivo from retinal blood vessels in six male Brown Norway rats. The total retinal blood flow (TRBF) was modified from baseline to 70% and 20% of baseline by reducing the ocular perfusion pressure (OPP). The retinal blood vessel caliber (RBVC) was measured from OCTA and DOCT images. The caliber measurements were conducted by two separate graders using a custom MATLAB-based image processing algorithm.ResultsThe RBVC measured with OCTA and DOCT for normal blood flow rates were not significantly different (56.69 ± 12.17 and 57.17 ± 9.46 μm, P = 0.27, respectively). However, significant differences were detected when TRBF was reduced to 70% (55.69 ± 11.56 vs. 50.62 ± 8.85 μm, P < 0.01) and 20% (50.29 ± 9.29 vs. 44.88 ± 7.13 μm, P < 0.01) of baseline.ConclusionsReduced TRBF resulted in inaccuracy of the RBVC measurements with DOCT in both the phantom and animal study. This result suggests that OCTA is a more accurate tool for RBVC evaluation when applied to retinal diseases associated with reduced TRBF, such as glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy.Translational RelevanceResults from this study are directly applicable to clinical studies of retinal blood flow measured with OCTA and DOCT.

Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by Optical Coherence Elastography

“…In principle, the use of higher-resolution OCT systems (for example, similar to those in studies 49,50 with a cellular-level resolution) should make it possible to distinguish the stiffness variations on a smaller scale, down to groups of a few cells or even single histologically changed cells embedded in a mechanically homogeneous strongly contrasting region of another type. However, typically increase in resolution of OCT systems results in a significantly reduced field of view.…”

Response to 1-Year Fixed-Regimen Bevacizumab Therapy in Treatment-Naïve DME Patients: Assessment by OCT Angiography

“…Currently, fluorescein angiography (FA) is the diagnostic gold standard for investigating the stages of DR [18]. By contrast, optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) allows depth-resolved visualization of each retinal capillary layer without the need for dye injection [1,12,[19][20][21][22]. The main advantage of this technique is that it enables three-dimensional imaging of retinal layers (superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP)) [3,23].…”

Comparisons between retinal vessel calibers and various optic disc morphologic parameters with different optic disc appearances: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study

“…Vessel caliber measurements can be obtained using fundus photography [29,30], retinal vessel analyzer [37], retinal oximetry [38,39], scanning laser ophthalmoscopy [40], spectraldomain optical coherence tomography (OCT) [41,42], OCT angiography [43], Doppler OCT [43], and adaptive optics imaging [44]. Analysis of digital color fundus photographs using semi-automated methods such as interactive vessel analysis reproducibly measured arteriolar and venular calibers [45].…”