Comparative Study of Quantitative Traits and Association of Yield and its Components in Black Gram (Vigna mungo) Genotypes

Malik, Muhammad Faisal Anwar; Awan, Shahid Iqbal; Niaz, Shahid

doi:10.3923/ajps.2008.26.29

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The considerable relationship between days to flowering and days to maturity, test weight and grain yield will lead to a direct indirect improvement in and grain output. Such variations of yield attributes among green gram genotypes were also reported by Siddique et al (2006), Malik et al (2008) and Rahim et al (2010).…”

Section: Plate 3: Effect Of Irrigation Levels On Green Gram Genotype ...supporting

confidence: 81%

“…Significantly higher dry weight with MH 1871 might be a credit to its higher shoot length, more leaves, and higher number of fruiting parts compared to other genotypes. Similar variations in dry weight among genotypes were also supported by the findings of Summy et al (2015), Siddique et al (2006), Malik et al (2008) and Rahim et al (2010). Yield and harvest index: Crop yield and harvest index of crops were significantly affected by irrigation schedules.…”

Section: Plate 3: Effect Of Irrigation Levels On Green Gram Genotype ...supporting

confidence: 76%

“…Among genotypes, significantly higher and lower harvest indexes were recorded by MH 1468 and MH 1762, respectively. Similarly, Summy et al (2015), Siddique et al (2006), Malik et al (2008), and Rahim et al (2010) also observed variation in yield among various cultivars due to genetic divergence. The ICC 4958 showed greater promise thanks to its higher seed output, improved plant water status, reduced membrane injury, and cooler canopy temperature (Summy et al, 2015).…”

Section: Plate 3: Effect Of Irrigation Levels On Green Gram Genotype ...mentioning

confidence: 84%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Biomass partitioning, yield and economic performance of green gram (Vigna radiate L.) genotypes as influenced by different irrigation levels

Dhaka,

Kumar,

Dhaka

et al. 2023

ECJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif season of2020 with four main plot treatments consisting of irrigation levels (No post sowing irrigation, one irrigation at the flower initiation stage, one irrigation at the pod filling stage and two irrigations each at flower initiation and pod filling stage) and five subplot treatments as genotypes viz., MH 1142, MH 1468, MH 1703, MH 1762 and MH 1871 following split plot design by replicating thrice. Irrigating green gram, irrespective of the growth stage, increased the seed yield significantly. Two irrigations each at the flower initiation and podding stage bring about greater seed economic yield of green gram than 1 irrigation either at each stage. Among single irrigations, flower initiation stage provided significantly superior (8.6 %) seed yield compared to the pod filling stage. During the flower initiation stage, no rain and irrigation at this stage led to more development of crop plants, as is evident from a higher number of branches per plant and, ultimately, a higher number of pods. Two irrigations, i.e., each at flower initiation and podding phase, lead to considerably greater seed output than single irrigation at either growth stage, which may be attributed to the sufficient supply of water, which indirectly provided a smooth supply of nutrients to crop plants. The increase was 18.4 and 28.6 per cent over-irrigation at flowering and podding stage, respectively. Seed yield varied among green gram genotypes, which might be because of variations in the genetic potential of the genotypes. Genotype MH 1871 produced significantly higher seed yield among different genotypes. The cumulative effect of yield traits viz. pods per plant, branches per plant, seed index and seeds per pod attributed to the higher seed yield in MH 1871. This genotype was more efficient in utilizing radiations, as evident from the higher chlorophyll content recorded in this genotype. Genotype MH 1142 was the lowest yielder and MH 1762 although produced. To obtain a higher yield of green gram, genotype MH 1871 be taken with two irrigations each at flower initiation and pod filling stage.

show abstract

Section: Plate 3: Effect Of Irrigation Levels On Green Gram Genotype ...supporting

confidence: 81%

Section: Plate 3: Effect Of Irrigation Levels On Green Gram Genotype ...supporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Plate 3: Effect Of Irrigation Levels On Green Gram Genotype ...mentioning

confidence: 84%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Biomass partitioning, yield and economic performance of green gram (Vigna radiate L.) genotypes as influenced by different irrigation levels

Dhaka,

Kumar,

Dhaka

et al. 2023

ECJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Influence of Water Stress on Biomass and Harvest Index in Three Mung Bean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek) Cultivars

Sadeghipour¹

2009

Asian J. of Plant Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Genetic variability and correlation studies in urdbean (Vigna mungoL.)

Punia¹,

Gautam²,

Ram³

et al. 2014

Legu. Rese. - An Inter. Jour.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparative Study of Quantitative Traits and Association of Yield and its Components in Black Gram (Vigna mungo) Genotypes

Cited by 4 publications

References 5 publications

Biomass partitioning, yield and economic performance of green gram (Vigna radiate L.) genotypes as influenced by different irrigation levels

Biomass partitioning, yield and economic performance of green gram (Vigna radiate L.) genotypes as influenced by different irrigation levels

The Influence of Water Stress on Biomass and Harvest Index in Three Mung Bean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek) Cultivars

Genetic variability and correlation studies in urdbean (Vigna mungoL.)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About