2022
DOI: 10.21009/jpensil.v11i1.24199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Rigid Pavement Planning Using Bina Marga 2017 and Aashto 1993 Methods

Abstract: This study was conducted to determine what factors influence the differences in the results of the Bina Marga 2017 method and the AASHTO 1993 method and determine which planning results are more efficient to be applied to Letjen S. Parman Street. The research method used is a comparative method, using the existing data and the latest data from surveys. As a result of analyzing a rigid road plan with a planned age of 40 years, the Bina Marga 2017 method obtained a concrete slab with a thickness of 305 mm, and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Menurut (Firgiansyah, Prihantono and Daryati, 2022) tanah dasar adalah tanah yang diletakkan lapisan struktur perkerasan lainnya, maka mutu dari daya dukung tanah dasar ikut berperan dalam mempengaruhi mutu jalan secara keseluruhan, oleh karena itu perkerasan jalan sangat bergantung pada daya dukung tanah dasar (Amaludin, 2019).…”
Section: Metode Aashto 1993unclassified
“…Menurut (Firgiansyah, Prihantono and Daryati, 2022) tanah dasar adalah tanah yang diletakkan lapisan struktur perkerasan lainnya, maka mutu dari daya dukung tanah dasar ikut berperan dalam mempengaruhi mutu jalan secara keseluruhan, oleh karena itu perkerasan jalan sangat bergantung pada daya dukung tanah dasar (Amaludin, 2019).…”
Section: Metode Aashto 1993unclassified
“…The study of the construction strength is carried out based on the rigid pavement planning guidelines, as follows [11]: a. Analysis of the type and thickness of the foundation Foundation with lean concrete (LC), with flexural tensile strength = 10 MPa, with a thickness of 100 mm (10 cm), on subgrade CBR 3% get an effective CBR of 20%.…”
Section: Rigid Pavement Construction Designmentioning
confidence: 99%