Comparative study of RIP, OSPF and EIGRP protocols using Cisco Packet Tracer

Dumitrache, Cristina; Predușcă, Gabriel; Circiumarescu, Liana-Denisa; Angelescu, N; Puchianu, Dan Constantin

doi:10.1109/iseee.2017.8170694

Cited by 17 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[13], the OSPF serves maximum throughput, most moderate queuing delay and suitable for more extensive networks. This conclusion confirms the valid data because it corelates with existing research results as elaborated in [14] [15]. We hope this paper contents can be used as a supplementary reference for internet network engineers and also network administrators.…”

Section: Figure 1 Configuration Scheme Of the Networksupporting

confidence: 88%

Rip vs. Ospf Routing Protocols: Which One Is the Best for a Real-Time Computer Network?

Majid

2020

Simet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of modern computer networks for internet access makes routing protocols needed, and it has an essential role in a real-time system. Therefore, the best and most effective routes can be reached. In this short article, we discuss the comparison of two popular routing protocols, i.e., Routing Information Protocol (RIP) and Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) using two network simulators, i.e., Graphical Network Simulator-3 (GNS3) and Enterprise Network Simulation Platform (ENSP). Both of OSPF and RIP routing protocols can be used in the same topology and have differences in the connection time required to connect communication between routers. Thru GNS3 and ENSP, we obtained the comparison result at ideal condition; we found that the OSPF routing protocol (83 ms) has a faster time or efficient in connection than RIP (177 ms). Besides, we found that compared to GNS3 network simulators (329 ms), the ENSP has a relatively more rapid average time (94 ms). This work suggests that a Huawei router with ENSP is faster than a Cisco router which is used by GNS3. Hopefully, this information can be refereed by internet network administrators to build real-time computer networks.

show abstract

Section: Figure 1 Configuration Scheme Of the Networksupporting

confidence: 88%

Rip vs. Ospf Routing Protocols: Which One Is the Best for a Real-Time Computer Network?

Majid

2020

Simet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To the classification "Distance vector" belongs the complying with procedures: RIP variation 1, RIP version 2, OSPF as well as EIGRP [2][3][4][5][6] these protocols are defined by the complying with functions as below revealed:…”

Section: Associated Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If in a router more than one routing method is carried out, the one which has fastest distance which can be taking into consideration as top priority. As an example, a transmitting protocol carried out in router is using OSPF method and also EIGRP protocol, in this instance the EIGRP protocol will certainly be utilized to course the data plans the reason is that the EIGRP protocol administrative range shorter compare to the OSPF, respectively 90 contrasting to 120 [2].…”

Section: Associated Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Analysis of Ripv2, OSPF and EIGRP Protocols using Cisco Packet Tracer Simulator 7.2

Mudimela,

Kumar

2020

IJEAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Figured out in modern massive networks there are existing of many independent system, vibrant transmitting procedures implemented regularly than the different kinds of fixed routing protocol, by the application of various new sorts of directing procedures can efficiently services the contemporary large system in the networking. The contemporary design of different transmitting convention protocols must be taken into considerations of current and as well as services need to be applied in the future by considering this for today's scenario witnessing a great development adjustment in the web traffic that is generated by utilization of the various applications. This study was conducted to test the performance analysis in between RIPV2, OSPF and also EIGRP with cisco package tracer simulator 7.2.

show abstract

“…355 with open shortest path first (OSPF) which will be sought in both protocols which are better in a predetermined situation [8].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance analysis routing protocol between RIPv2 and EIGRP with termination test on full mesh topology

Prehanto

Indriyanti

Permadi³

2021

IJEECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<span>Data access on a company is a very important part of an institution or a college. Especially in the present time, the internet has become an important thing in human life. With the existence of certain means there is a problem that will arise, needed solution or way out on a network that can be called protocol. Because an institution needs to choose network methods properly and safely.This study focuses on addressing the path/route of data packets to be sent will be governed by this routing protocol in the form of table routing. Routing used adip RIPv2 with EIGRP which will be compared on both routing protocol which is better against predetermined situation previous.The result of the research using CISCO Packet Tracer 7.10 software shows that EIGRP routing run on two topologies has faster convergence time speed with an average time of 0.01 - 0.02 seconds as well as the change of its routing table at once. Unlike RIPv2 routing that takes longer than EIGRP routing is with the time range from 0.01 to 0.19. </span>

show abstract

Comparative study of RIP, OSPF and EIGRP protocols using Cisco Packet Tracer

Cited by 17 publications

References 1 publication

Rip vs. Ospf Routing Protocols: Which One Is the Best for a Real-Time Computer Network?

Rip vs. Ospf Routing Protocols: Which One Is the Best for a Real-Time Computer Network?

Performance Analysis of Ripv2, OSPF and EIGRP Protocols using Cisco Packet Tracer Simulator 7.2

Performance analysis routing protocol between RIPv2 and EIGRP with termination test on full mesh topology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About