Comparative Study of Single-user Spectrum Sensing Techniques in Cognitive Radio Networks

Jaglan, Reena Rathee; Sarowa, Sandeep; Mustafa, Rashid; Agrawal, Sunil; Kumar, Naresh

doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.039

Cited by 22 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to the available literature, there are also other methods which are less often applied for spectrum sensing, but they are possible candidates for RCIED activation signal detection. Some of them are waveform based detection, eigen-value based detection, wavelet based edge detection, ciclostationary feature detection [20] and so on. These methods, as generally less often applied ones, are beyond the scope of this paper.…”

Section: Principles Of Detection Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability analysis of different RCIED activation signal responsive jamming techniques and their comparison to active jamming

Mileusnic¹,

Petrović²,

Kosjer³

et al. 2020

FACTA U EE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we compared the time required for the successful jamming of remote controlled improvised explosive devices activation using active and responsive jamming methods. As a representative of active jamming method we analyzed jamming signal generation using frequency sweep. For the analysis of the possible activating signal presence based on responsive jamming procedures we first supposed Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) implementation and compared its analysis rate to the rate of sweep jamming. Taking into account the current technology state, it is proved that the time required to achieve the successful jamming relied on FFT analysis may be less than in the case of active sweep jamming. After that we considered pros and cons for energy detector and matched filter detector implementation in responsive jamming. For these two detector types it is shown how to determine the number of analysis blocks to achieve approximately the same number of collected samples as in the case of FFT implementation, starting from the probabilities of false detection and miss of detection.

show abstract

Section: Principles Of Detection Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability analysis of different RCIED activation signal responsive jamming techniques and their comparison to active jamming

Mileusnic¹,

Petrović²,

Kosjer³

et al. 2020

FACTA U EE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Among various SS techniques documented in the literature under the category of single‐user SS such as match filter detection (MFD), waveform‐based detection, cyclo‐stationary feature detection (CFD), and energy detection (ED). Out of these, ED is the most commonly employed technique [1], due to simplicity and efficiency. However, the performance of this single‐user ED‐based SS technique degrades in fading and shadowing the environment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%