Comparative study of the Ambu® AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask and endotracheal intubation in anesthesia airway management during neurosurgery

Zhang, Qiaoyun; Sun, Yongxing; Wang, Baoguo; Wang, Shuangyan; Feng, Mengyu; Zhang, Yunxin

doi:10.1177/0300060520902606

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Stimuli can lead to hypertension, tachycardia, and catecholamine release. [ 13 14 ] It may be harmful to patients with hypertension, glaucoma, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular malformations. In our study, the differences in drugs used to raise blood pressure, lower blood pressure, increase heart rate, and reduce heart rate during surgery between the two groups were not statistically significant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway for general anesthesia on perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis

Jia,

Zhang,

Wang

et al. 2023

Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To compare perioperative adverse events between general anesthesia with endotracheal tube (ETT) and general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a large sample retrospective, propensity score-matched (PSM) study. We collected the data of 6739 female patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy between January 2016 and June 2021 in our hospital, China. Patients were divided into two groups (ETT group and LMA group) according to different airway management modes. Data on all perioperative adverse events were collected. PSM analysis was performed to control confounding factors and differences in baseline values between the two groups. Finally, 4150 female patients were recruited after PSM. Results: The total number of patients taking intraoperative vasoactive drugs during surgery was higher in the ETT group than in the LMA group (P = 0.04). The LMA group had a higher incidence of vomiting (51 [2.46%]) and somnolence (165 [7.95]) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) than the ETT group (71 [3.42%] and 102 [4.92%], respectively) (P = 0.02 and P < 0.001). Hypothermia was significantly higher in the LMA group (183 [10.36%]) than in the ETT group (173 [8.34%]) in the PACU (P = 0.03). The number of patients with sore throat was significantly higher in the ETT group (434 [20.02%]) than in the LMA group (299 [14.41%]) in the ward (P < 0.001). Other variables such as hypoxemia, moderate to severe pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, sleep disorders, wound bleeding, and skin itch were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The ETT group had more incidences of vomiting, sore throat, and cough complications and needed more drug treatment than the LMA group. LMA is a better airway management mode and LMA general anesthesia can be safely used in patients undergoing laparoscopic nonemergency hysterectomy.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway for general anesthesia on perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis

Jia,

Zhang,

Wang

et al. 2023

Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The double lumen LMA is used in various operations because it greatly reduces reflux and aspiration [ 16 ]. Previous study showed that anesthesia using LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) during general anesthesia reduced hemodynamic fluctuation during surgery compared to endotracheal intubation [ 17 , 18 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Jcerity Endoscoper Airway with the LMA supreme for airway management in patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm embolization: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Zhou

Wang

et al. 2022

BMC Anesthesiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Jcerity Endoscoper Airway is a new back-open endoscopic laryngeal mask airway device with a unique design. Our study sought to compare the implantation, ventilation quality and complications of JEA (Jcerity Endoscoper airway) versus LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) Supreme in the procedure of cerebral aneurysm embolization. Methods In this prospective, randomised clinical trial, 182 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists class Ι-II scheduled for interventional embolization of cerebral aneurysms were randomly allocated into the Jcerity Endoscoper airway group and the LMA Supreme group. We compared success rate of LMA implantation, ventilation quality, airway sealing pressure, peak airway pressure, degree of blood staining, postoperative oral hemorrhage, sore throat and other complications between the groups. Results There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of one-time success rate of LMA implantation, ventilation quality, airway sealing pressure or airway peak pressure. However, LMA Supreme group showed a higher degree of blood staining than the JEA group when the laryngeal mask airway was removed (P = 0.04), and there were also more oral hemorrhages and pharyngeal pain than JEA group (P = 0.03, P = 0.02). No differences were observed between groups in terms of other airway complications related to the LMA. Conclusions The JEA could not only achieve comparable one-time success rate of implantation and quality of ventilation as the LMA Supreme, but also have lower blood staining degree of mask and less sore throat in patients undergoing perioperative anticoagulation for cerebral aneurysm interventional embolization. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100044133; Registered 11/03/2021. Statement: This study adheres to CONSORT guidelines.

show abstract

“…General anesthesia with tracheal intubation requires deeper anesthesia and proper muscle relaxation during the induction as well as maintenance of anesthesia. During tracheal intubation and extubation, there are often substantial hemodynamic uctuations that are extremely harmful to patients with aneurysms; these often cause serious adverse reactions such as cerebral aneurysm rupture and hemorrhage [22,23].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Jcerity Endoscoper Airway with the LMA Supreme for Airway Management in Patients Undergoing Cerebral Aneurysm Embolization

Zhou

Wang

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Interventional embolization of cerebral aneurysms often requires anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy during perioperative period. A new type of laryngeal mask airway (Jcerity Endoscoper Airway)with a unique design may cause less oropharyngeal injury and bleeding for patients receiving perioperative anticoagulation. This study sought to compare the efficacy, safety and complications of Jcerity Endoscoper airwayvs LMA((Laryngeal Mask Airway) Supreme in the procedure of cerebral aneurysm embolization. Methods In this prospective, randomised clinical trial, 182 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists class Ι-II scheduled for interventional embolization of cerebral aneurysms were randomly allocated into the Jcerity Endoscoper airway group and the LMA Supreme group. We compared success rate of LMA implantation, ventilation quality, airway sealing pressure, peak airway pressure, degree of blood staining, postoperative oral hemorrhage, sore throat and other complications between the groups. Results There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of success rate of LMA implantation, ventilation quality, airway sealing pressure or airway peak pressure. The LMA Supreme group showed a significantly higher degree of blood staining than the Jcerity Endoscoper airway group when the laryngeal mask airway was removed (P = 0.04), and there were also more oral hemorrhages and pharyngeal pain than in the the Jcerity Endoscoper airway group (P = 0.03,P = 0.02). No differences were observed between groups in terms of other complications related to the LMA. Conclusions The Jcerity Endoscoper airway can be safely and effectively used for airway management in patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm embolization, which can significantly reduce airway complications related to perioperative anticoagulation.

show abstract

Comparative study of the Ambu® AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask and endotracheal intubation in anesthesia airway management during neurosurgery

Cited by 4 publications

References 41 publications

Influence of endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway for general anesthesia on perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis

Influence of endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway for general anesthesia on perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis

Comparison of the Jcerity Endoscoper Airway with the LMA supreme for airway management in patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm embolization: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Comparison of the Jcerity Endoscoper Airway with the LMA Supreme for Airway Management in Patients Undergoing Cerebral Aneurysm Embolization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About