Comparative study of totally extra-peritoneal hernia repair versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia

Abstract

How to cite / Atıf için: Kara Y. Comparative study of totally extra-peritoneal hernia repair versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia.

Comparison of stripping/ligation and embolization with cyanoacrylate in venous insufficiency treatment

“…Between the two ends of a 100 mm line, the patient is asked to select the point that suits his or her condition. This test is calculated as 0 (zero): I have no pain, 10: I have the worst pain possible [17,18]. The VAS scale applied to our patients revealed less pain in the CA group during local anesthesia.…”

The effect of tack number and balloon trocar use on acute post-operative pain scores of patients who underwent TEP repair of inguinal hernia

“…Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair is one of the minimally-invasive (laparoscopic) methods for inguinal hernia repair and despite its negative sides such as longer learning period and difficulties in performing, TEP is highly preferred by surgeons since it offers lower rate of complications including acute postoperative pain, chronic postoperative inguinal pain, recurrence, and its requirement of less number of closing material [3,4]. In the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) using TEP approach, a prosthetic mesh is placed to cover all current and future possible hernia sites in order to fix the herniated bowel and prevent recurrence through an extraperitoneal incision [5,6].…”