Comparative Study on Life-Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint of Hybrid, Concrete and Timber Apartment Buildings in Finland

Abstract

To date, in the literature, there has been no study on the comparison of hybrid (timber and concrete) buildings with counterparts made of timber and concrete as the most common construction materials, in terms of the life cycle assessment (LCA) and the carbon footprint. This paper examines the environmental impacts of a five-story hybrid apartment building compared to timber and reinforced concrete counterparts in whole-building life-cycle assessment using the software tool, One Click LCA, for the estimation of environmental impacts from building materials of assemblies, construction, and building end-of-life treatment of 50 years in Finland. Following EN 15978, stages of product and construction (A1–A5), use (B1–B6), end-of-life (C1–C4), and beyond the building life cycle (D) were assessed. The main findings highlighted are as following: (1) for A1–A3, the timber apartment had the smallest carbon footprint (28% less than the hybrid apartment); (2) in A4, the timber apartment had a much smaller carbon footprint (55% less than the hybrid apartment), and the hybrid apartment had a smaller carbon footprint (19%) than the concrete apartment; (3) for B1–B5, the carbon footprint of the timber apartment was larger (>20%); (4) in C1–C4, the carbon footprint of the concrete apartment had the lowest emissions (35,061 kg CO2-e), and the timber apartment had the highest (44,627 kg CO2-e), but in D, timber became the most advantageous material; (5) the share of life-cycle emissions from building services was very significant. Considering the environmental performance of hybrid construction as well as its other advantages over timber, wood-based hybrid solutions can lead to more rational use of wood, encouraging the development of more efficient buildings. In the long run, this will result in a higher proportion of wood in buildings, which will be beneficial for living conditions, the environment, and the society in general.

The Current State of the Finnish Cottage Phenomenon: Perspectives of Experts

“…Wood is perceived as a natural and warm material that sits beautifully in the Finnish forest landscape [53][54][55][56][57]. Wooden buildings are also ecological [58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. Other advantages of log construction include breathability, moisture balance, allergy friendliness, and aesthetics [69].…”

Green construction for low-carbon cities: a review

“…In order to implement measures to reduce carbon emissions during the construction phase, it is crucial to develop effective methods for assessing the environmental impact of the construction phase (Basbagill et al 2013;Röck et al 2020). Life cycle assessment is frequently used in the construction industry to evaluate environmental impact, with carbon emissions serving as its leading evaluation indicator (Rinne et al 2022;Teh et al 2017). In recent years, random forests and neural networks have also been used to calculate and predict carbon emissions in the construction industry, thanks to the continuous development of computer technology and big data technology (Fang et al 2021;Ye et al 2018).…”

Tallest Timber Buildings: Main Architectural and Structural Design Considerations

“…With the successful implementation of issues such as efficiency and passive standards in just a few years, there has been an increased emphasis on sustainability during and after the construction site [10]. Furthermore, today, the construction industry accounts for approximately 40% of annual greenhouse gas emissions, 40% of global resource consumption, 40% of energy use, and 50% of global waste, timber is a valuable alternative material [11,12].…”