2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on the impact-sliding wear behaviour of CAD/CAM resin-ceramic materials and tooth enamel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of wear amounts of the materials used in this study were considered between 0.20 (Q1:0.14; Q3:0.27 μm) and 0.75 (Q1:0.70; Q3:0.82) (Table 3). Vita Enamic was reported to have a higher level of microhardness and elastic modulus than the resin-based materials and also presented the closest surface hardness values to dental enamel tissue, previously 25,26) . Supporting these findings, according to our results, Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate materials presented similar microhardness values to the dental enamel.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of wear amounts of the materials used in this study were considered between 0.20 (Q1:0.14; Q3:0.27 μm) and 0.75 (Q1:0.70; Q3:0.82) (Table 3). Vita Enamic was reported to have a higher level of microhardness and elastic modulus than the resin-based materials and also presented the closest surface hardness values to dental enamel tissue, previously 25,26) . Supporting these findings, according to our results, Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate materials presented similar microhardness values to the dental enamel.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%