1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01975202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing core needle to surgical biopsies in breast cancer for cell kinetic and ploidy studies

Abstract: The evaluability and reliability of proliferative activity (expressed as 3H-thymidine labeling index, 3H-TdR LI) and ploidy determinations on core needle biopsies were compared with those obtained on surgical material from the same breast cancers. The evaluability of 3H-TdR LI on core needle biopsies was markedly lower than that on surgical material (53% vs 100%), and the association between 3H-TdR LI values in the 16 cases with both evaluable determinations was poor (rs = 0.45). Conversely, determinations of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The needle core biopsy specimens in this study with ER results disparate from those for the mastectomy specimens constituted fewer than 1% of the needle core biopsy specimens evaluated at our institution, which is similar to the high degree of correlation reported by other authors. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] The importance of minimum formalin fixation times and properly fixed tissue are not novel topics. Authors repeatedly have made these points in the context of good histologic sections, 6,42-48 consistent and accurate immunohistochemical results, 3,13,18,24,25,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] and optimum immunohistochemical image ER values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The needle core biopsy specimens in this study with ER results disparate from those for the mastectomy specimens constituted fewer than 1% of the needle core biopsy specimens evaluated at our institution, which is similar to the high degree of correlation reported by other authors. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] The importance of minimum formalin fixation times and properly fixed tissue are not novel topics. Authors repeatedly have made these points in the context of good histologic sections, 6,42-48 consistent and accurate immunohistochemical results, 3,13,18,24,25,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] and optimum immunohistochemical image ER values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have addressed similar issues for markers other than angiogenesis and reproducible results have been obtained for determinations of DNA ploidy, bcl-2, oestrogen receptor, c-erbB-2 and p53, which are dichotomously scored variables (Daidone et al, 1991;Jacobs et al, 1998). Jacobs et al failed to produce reproducible results for mvc and accuracy was not improved by increasing tumour area available for assessment by performing more core biopsies (Jacobs et al, 1998).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 87%