2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing different approaches to in situ measurement of building components thermal resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
90
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the correct environmental conditions it has been proposed that evaluating R-value of buildings by direct measurement using a heat flux sensor and surface temperature sensors is more useful than using standardised R-values of the various layers of the composite system [21].…”
Section: R-value and Constant Heat Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the correct environmental conditions it has been proposed that evaluating R-value of buildings by direct measurement using a heat flux sensor and surface temperature sensors is more useful than using standardised R-values of the various layers of the composite system [21].…”
Section: R-value and Constant Heat Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature difference measured across the structure indicates the thermal resistance of the element [20]. The higher the temperature difference across the wall, the higher the accuracy of the in situ methods and a temperature difference below 10 • C is not considered sufficiently accurate [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear thermal bridges can be implemented through the analysis of each thermogram corresponding to an object's surface temperature [16][17][18]. Bianchi [19] said that thermographic analysis allows for the identification of thermal bridges in buildings' envelope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy analysis of buildings through simulations is possible by means of different methodologies: some of them use simplified energy analysis tools, with a quick evaluation of the annual energy consumption, others use more detailed analysis based on dynamic algorithms [13][14][15].…”
Section: Simulations: Methodology and Description Of The Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%