2016 17th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ichqp.2016.7783313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing NSGA-II and SPEA2 metaheuristics in solving the problem of optimal capacitor banks placement and sizing in distribution grids considering harmonic distortion restrictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [27], NSGA II is also proposed to solve the proposed issue taking into account the total harmonic distortion constraint; however, there are some solutions on the Pareto front, which exceed the security boundaries in terms of voltage resonance. In [28], a comparison is made between NSGA II and Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA 2) to solve this issue taking into account the limitations of harmonic distortion. However, NSGA-II results in lower quality solutions, and SPEA 2 yields several solutions that violate voltage constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [27], NSGA II is also proposed to solve the proposed issue taking into account the total harmonic distortion constraint; however, there are some solutions on the Pareto front, which exceed the security boundaries in terms of voltage resonance. In [28], a comparison is made between NSGA II and Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA 2) to solve this issue taking into account the limitations of harmonic distortion. However, NSGA-II results in lower quality solutions, and SPEA 2 yields several solutions that violate voltage constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main versions: (1+1), (1+λ), and (µ+λ)-PAES[146], where (1+1)-ES means that during each iteration, one mutant is created from one parent, and their union is used in the selection.PESA2 Pareto Envelope based It uses a region based selection operator, instead of individual based ones, Selection Algorithm like NSGA-II. It requires only O(k • n) comparisons for every hyperbox [147].SPEA2Strength based SPEA-2 uses the strength based diversity operator, the calculation and Evolutionary Algorithm sorting time of which are more expensive than the case of NSGA-II; however, the diversity and convergence of the results can be better, which can be advantageous in the case of expensive optimization problems[148].IBEA Indicator BasedIt uses a flexible integration of preference information. Therefore, an arbitrary Evolutionary Algorithm performance indicator can be used for the search.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%