2012
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2011.579917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing operationalizations of dual commitment and their relationships with turnover intentions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, our study not only provides additional evidence of the existence of dual commitment (Carson et al, ; Ezirim et al, ; Robinson et al, ), but also empirically demonstrates that collaborative union–management relations do not necessarily weaken the relationship between the union and its members. In this respect, the positive links between the WRC and both union and organisational commitment in our final model are in line with the argument that positive workplace relations provide the right cognitive conditions (Festinger, ) for the adoption of dual commitment by limiting workers' role conflicts (Magenau et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, our study not only provides additional evidence of the existence of dual commitment (Carson et al, ; Ezirim et al, ; Robinson et al, ), but also empirically demonstrates that collaborative union–management relations do not necessarily weaken the relationship between the union and its members. In this respect, the positive links between the WRC and both union and organisational commitment in our final model are in line with the argument that positive workplace relations provide the right cognitive conditions (Festinger, ) for the adoption of dual commitment by limiting workers' role conflicts (Magenau et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…This result is in line with previous research that used the correlational approach to assess the presence of dual commitment and obtained similar results (Johnson, Johson, & Patterson, ; Snape & Chan, ). In this regard, previous research has generally “found correlations from 0.22 to 0.34 to be indicative of dual commitment” (e.g., Barling, Wade, & Fullagar, 1990; Gordon, Beauvais, & Ladd, , in Robinson et al, : 1344).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, over 99 per cent of individuals are assigned to the same taxons across four samples in the Sverke and Sjoberg () Swedish union data. The distribution of individuals produced by the mid‐point split differs markedly from the median and mean splits in assigning fewer individuals to a dual commitment taxon in the Sverke and Sjoberg () but more in a Korean study of union members by Robinson et al (). Lastly, the Swedish study found cluster analysis assigned 88 and 87.3 per cent of individuals to the same taxons as are allocated by median and mean splits, respectively.…”
Section: Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The choice of approach is essentially an arbitrary one, and some studies apply alternative bifurcation methods and then assess the impact on the results (e.g. Sverke and Sjoberg, 1994;Robinson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Commitment To Organisation and To Unionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation