2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1552-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting for soil as pollution in Beijing

Abstract: Spatial interpolation method is the basis of soil heavy metal pollution assessment and remediation. The existing evaluation index for interpolation accuracy did not combine with actual situation. The selection of interpolation methods needs to be based on specific research purposes and research object characteristics. In this paper, As pollution in soils of Beijing was taken as an example. The prediction accuracy of ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse distance weighted (IDW) were evaluated based on the cross val… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In sampling region I, based on the statistical characteristics, the EFs of Zn, Cu, and Cd exceeding 1.5 accounted for 10.3%, 10.3%, and 34.5% of the total 29 soil profiles, respectively (Figure 4). Spatial variation in the EF of potentially toxic elements can be interpolated by inverse distance weighting [72]. According to the spatial distribution of the EFs of the potentially toxic elements, the EFs of Zn that were higher than one accounted for 97.62% of the total area, those exceeding 1.5 accounted for 1.16% of the total area, and there were no areas with EFs greater than two.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sampling region I, based on the statistical characteristics, the EFs of Zn, Cu, and Cd exceeding 1.5 accounted for 10.3%, 10.3%, and 34.5% of the total 29 soil profiles, respectively (Figure 4). Spatial variation in the EF of potentially toxic elements can be interpolated by inverse distance weighting [72]. According to the spatial distribution of the EFs of the potentially toxic elements, the EFs of Zn that were higher than one accounted for 97.62% of the total area, those exceeding 1.5 accounted for 1.16% of the total area, and there were no areas with EFs greater than two.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated environmental noise exposure at the geocoded residential address of each individual using spatial interpolation. Spatial interpolation methods such as inverse distance weighted (IDW), and kriging are commonly used in epidemiological studies to assess environmental exposure [16,17]. Environmental noise in particular can be estimated using kriging which has been proposed as a suitable spatial interpolation method in producing noise maps covering the full temporal and spatial extent of the study area [18,19].…”
Section: Environmental Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Inverse Distance Weight Interpolation (IDW) is a weighted average interpolation method [63]. In this study, the IDW was used to determine the spatial distribution of soil risk elements (Eq.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Risk Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%