2022
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2037398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing real-life effectiveness of various COVID-19 vaccine regimens during the delta variant-dominant pandemic: a test-negative case-control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
55
1
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
55
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In ChAdOx1 schedule (74%) compared to homologous 2-dose ChAdOx1 (83%), and higher than 2-dose CoronaVac (60%) schedule 23 . In countries where mRNA vaccines are in limited supply, their use as a second dose in the primary series or third dose would have the benefit of providing robust immunogenicity while also potentially reducing the risks of the rare side effects such as pericarditis and myocarditis which are mainly reported after the second dose of mRNA vaccines 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In ChAdOx1 schedule (74%) compared to homologous 2-dose ChAdOx1 (83%), and higher than 2-dose CoronaVac (60%) schedule 23 . In countries where mRNA vaccines are in limited supply, their use as a second dose in the primary series or third dose would have the benefit of providing robust immunogenicity while also potentially reducing the risks of the rare side effects such as pericarditis and myocarditis which are mainly reported after the second dose of mRNA vaccines 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…With improved vaccination coverage, particularly in LMICs, this would reduce the chance of new variants emerging and improve global equity. Evaluation of such schedule in a Thailand have revealed similar vaccine effectiveness between heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 schedule (74%) compared to homologous 2-dose ChAdOx1 (83%), and higher than 2-dose CoronaVac (60%) schedule 23 . In countries where mRNA vaccines are in limited supply, their use as a second dose in the primary series or third dose would have the benefit of providing robust immunogenicity while also potentially reducing the risks of the rare side effects such as pericarditis and myocarditis which are mainly reported after the second dose of mRNA vaccines 24,25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For CoronaVac, data was comparatively limited. 344 , 345 One large national cohort study in Chile, including about 2 million 6–16 years old participants, suggests that programmed vaccination of CoronaVac remains effective against Delta variant, reducing 74.5% (95% CI, 73.8–75.2) of symptomatic infection and 91.0% (95% CI, 87.8–93.4) of hospitalization. 346 However, CoronaVac VE against Gamma variant 14 days post the second dose was estimated to be 46.8% (95% CI, 38.7–53.8) regarding symptomatic infection and 55.5% (95% CI, 46.5–62.9) regarding hospitalization, suggesting that Gamma variant may dramatically compromise CoronaVac-elicited immune protection.…”
Section: Molecular Characteristics Of Sequence and The Encoded Protei...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,20 Our data is highly consistent with a recent study from Bangkok in Thailand evaluating 3 rd dose schedules against the delta variant. 21 In that study, the adjusted VE among individuals who received two and three doses of the vaccines was 65% (95% CI, 56-72), and 91% (95% CI, 84-95), respectively during the delta predominant period. This compares well with what we observed, 63% for two doses, 97% for three doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although the current study did not have su cient events to compare VE of third dose against delta by vaccine type, the recent publication by Sritipsukho et al, found comparable protection from a third dose of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2. 21 Together, this data strongly suggests that accelerating the third and fourth dose vaccinations and increasing coverage by using any vaccines available, particularly among those aged 60 and older or those with co-morbidities is a valid strategy. Vaccination in addition to using personal protection measures such as wearing a mask, social distancing, and avoiding crowded settings, can help to reduce omicron strain outbreaks and, more importantly, mortality in the elderly or those with co-morbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%