2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing semi-automatic systems for recruitment of patients to clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
69
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of reports have been published on support systems for clinical trial recruitment, and these are reviewed by Köpcke and Prokosch [11] as well as Cuggia et al [10]. Although the recruitment support system was not the primary aim in the development of the PRAEG-NANT study, it was used for this purpose in the analysis presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A variety of reports have been published on support systems for clinical trial recruitment, and these are reviewed by Köpcke and Prokosch [11] as well as Cuggia et al [10]. Although the recruitment support system was not the primary aim in the development of the PRAEG-NANT study, it was used for this purpose in the analysis presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic systems to support the recruitment of trial subjects have previously been implemented by comparing electronic data with eligibility criteria to provide candidate lists for subsequent physician review [7][8][9][10][11]. Such systems have so far been based on the secondary use of data captured in electronic health records (EHRs) during the provision of routine clinical care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This secondary use often involves the identification of patient cohorts from EHR data (or EHR-driven phenotyping), which is an expensive and timeconsuming process. According to recent reviews, 1 there are many publications reporting on automated systems to facilitate this task. Most of these works rely on proprietary formats for data integration, and rarely use EHR interoperability standards like HL7, openEHR, or ISO13606.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…D'autres processus sont envisageables [14], comme l'aide au recrutement par détection automatique de critères d'éligibilité à partir de données produites dans le SIH au cours de la prise en charge des patients. Dans cette approche, des évène-ments déclencheurs sont détectés en temps réel (par exemple, la production d'un résultat biologique anormal).…”
Section: Processus Décisionnelunclassified