2022
DOI: 10.1017/s0272263122000389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the longitudinal development of phraseological complexity across oral and written tasks

Abstract: This study builds upon previous research investigating the construct validity of phraseological complexity as an index of L2 development and proficiency. Whereas previous studies have focused on cross-sectional comparisons of written productions across proficiency levels, the current study compares the longitudinal development of phraseological complexity in written and oral productions elicited over a 21-month period from learners of French. We also improve upon the state of the art by including L1 data to be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one study thus far has directly compared phraseological complexity across modes, however. Vandeweerd et al (2022) compared the diversity and sophistication of direct objects (verb + noun) and adjectival modifiers (noun + adjective) across oral and written tasks collected from university-level learners of French over a period of 21 months. While the design of the corpus made it difficult to isolate the precise effects of task characteristics (e.g., modality, interactivity) from register, comparison of the learner group and a first language (L1) group seemed to indicate that the extra planning time afforded by the written task had a positive effect on the phraseological complexity in learner productions but that this effect was somewhat mediated by the functional requirements of the task, as seen by the fact that the complexity of the noun-based units (adjectival modifiers) and verb-based units (direct objects) differed across tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study thus far has directly compared phraseological complexity across modes, however. Vandeweerd et al (2022) compared the diversity and sophistication of direct objects (verb + noun) and adjectival modifiers (noun + adjective) across oral and written tasks collected from university-level learners of French over a period of 21 months. While the design of the corpus made it difficult to isolate the precise effects of task characteristics (e.g., modality, interactivity) from register, comparison of the learner group and a first language (L1) group seemed to indicate that the extra planning time afforded by the written task had a positive effect on the phraseological complexity in learner productions but that this effect was somewhat mediated by the functional requirements of the task, as seen by the fact that the complexity of the noun-based units (adjectival modifiers) and verb-based units (direct objects) differed across tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that complex linguistic structures can emerge from the co-occurrence of linguistic units in actual language use (Bybee & Hopper, 2001;Cong & Liu, 2021), this paper adopts a simpler word co-occurrence network approach to measure L2 Chinese development. Word co-occurrences, i.e., bi-gram words, are increasingly being recognized as an important feature for distinguishing L2 learners' pro ciencies under the phraseological complexity construct in recent years Garner et al, 2019;Vandeweerd et al, 2022). Moreover, unlike phraseological complexity indices that need a reference corpus, the word co-occurrence network approach does not require extra resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%