2018
DOI: 10.14366/usg.17009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and conventional 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography in neonates: impact on reinterpretation

Abstract: PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate impact of 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography (3DUS) on reinterpretation of cranial ultrasonography images in neonates in comparison with 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography (2DUS).MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 50 young infants who simultaneously underwent both 2DUS and 3DUS scanning from February to March 2015. Two pediatric radiologists independently reviewed both scans for overall image quality on a 5-point scale. Five features were evaluated in both sca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative volume analyses from ultrasound are limited with standard ultrasound imaging with narrow fields of views. Comparison between 2D US and 3D US was previously studied (Romero et al 2014), demonstrating that 3D US decreases acquisition time compared to standard 2D US protocols, without deteriorating the diagnostic quality (Kim et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative volume analyses from ultrasound are limited with standard ultrasound imaging with narrow fields of views. Comparison between 2D US and 3D US was previously studied (Romero et al 2014), demonstrating that 3D US decreases acquisition time compared to standard 2D US protocols, without deteriorating the diagnostic quality (Kim et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-D US has been shown to produce diagnostic images in multiple radiology subspecialities, ranging from breast to obstetrics, and inclusive of both the fetal and neonatal brain [ 6 9 , 9 , 10 ]. Irrespective of the method used, 3-D US acquisition is semi-automated, with reduced input from the operator [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, 3-D US allows the acquisition of a volumetric data set of the whole area of interest, reducing the potential to miss relevant anatomical regions, and increasing intra- and inter-individual reproducibility through permitting reconstruction in multiple planes [ 12 ]. Shorter acquisition times have also been shown for acquiring 3-D studies [ 8 , 9 ], which is of clear benefit to sick neonates immobilised by medical equipment. Therefore, 3-D US offers multiple solutions to many of the limitations of 2-D US.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work with transfontanelle brain three-dimensional (3-D) US has been attempted in neonates 9 13 While this imaging technique was shown to be feasible and gives similar measurements 14 and diagnosis 12 , 15 , 16 as two-dimensional (2-D) US, its clinical utility beyond 2-D has not been established. Recent studies have had success acquiring 3-D US images of neonatal ventricles using commercial systems; 9 , 10 , 12 , 14 16 however, these transducers are not part of standard-of-care and must be purchased separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%