1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1078-5884(97)80006-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between clinical examination, cw-Doppler ultrasound and colour-duplex sonography in the diagnosis of incompetent perforating veins

Abstract: In patients with CVI, clinical and cw-Doppler cannot accurately diagnose ICPV when compared to CDS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the area of the saphenofemoral junction was assessed. Valvular incompetence was evidenced by the reversal of blood flow (reflux) longer than 0.5 s [15,18]. The probe was moved along the varicose veins to visualize the perforating ones.…”
Section: Doppler Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the area of the saphenofemoral junction was assessed. Valvular incompetence was evidenced by the reversal of blood flow (reflux) longer than 0.5 s [15,18]. The probe was moved along the varicose veins to visualize the perforating ones.…”
Section: Doppler Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMD can be evaluated using plethysmography [2,3,[17][18][19][20], and the presence and location of venous reflux can be investigated using duplex scanning [7,8,[21][22][23]. Unfortunately, there is no reliable non-invasive test for the evaluation of perforator incompetence [24,25]. The importance of deep vein obstruction in the pathophysiology of CVI is still a matter of debate [6,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPV can be detected with continuous wave (CW) Doppler, but CW Doppler has no advantage over clinical examination 81 . Compared with Duplex, CW Doppler has a low sensitivity (29%) and low specificity (15%) in detecting IPVs 27 . Nowadays, CW Doppler is not considered a reliable method to diagnose IPV 27,78,81,82 …”
Section: Diagnostic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflux must be measured preferably in the relaxation phase after distal compression 14 . The duration of reflux as a criterion of incompetence varies from 0.3 seconds 24 to 1 second, 25 but most authors consider reflux of more than 0.5 second as evidence for incompetence 23,26–29 . Concerning the diameter, it has been shown that IPVs have a bigger diameter than competent ones 15,23,26 .…”
Section: Ipvsmentioning
confidence: 99%