Comparison Between Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and in Center Hemodialysis

Huraib, Sameer; Abu‐Aisha, Hassan; Mitwalli, Ahmed; Memon, Nawaz Ali; Sulimani, Fathia; Agraharkar, Mahendra

doi:10.5144/0256-4947.1990.394

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another limitation is that, with the exception of the study by Karlberg & Nyberg (1995), all of the studies identified, were based on relatively small sample sizes and the largest study explicitly assumed that survival was the same for all treatment modalities. This assumption does not correspond with the data extracted from the four studies that reported survival (Churchill, et al, 1984;Croxon & Ashton, 1990;Sesso, et al, 1990;Huraib, et al, 1990).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Systematic review 6: Comparison of haemodialysis with CAPD as treatment for patients with ESRD effectiveness of CAPD and haemodialysis. A total of seven evaluations were identified (Tajima, et al, 1987;Churchill, et al, 1984;Croxson & Ashton, 1990;Karlberg & Nyberg, 1995;Sesso, et al, 1990;Huraib, et al, 1990;Smith, et al, 1989); a summary of these articles is presented in Table 42.…”

Section: Appendixmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All except two of the studies (Karlberg & Nyberg, 1995;Smith, et al, 1989) were based on retrospective unmatched cohort studies. Two studies addressed the efficiency of CAPD relative to hospital haemodialysis, (Karlberg & Nyberg, 1995;Huraib, et al, 1990), two also looked at renal transplantation (Tajima, et al, 1987;Sesso, et al, 1990), two included both home haemodialysis and renal transplantation (Croxson & Ashton, 1990;Karlberg & Nyberg, 1995), and one looked at CAPD, hospital haemodialysis, home haemodialysis and subsidiary unit haemodialysis (Smith, et al, 1989).The results are summarised in Table 43.…”

Section: Appendixmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The study by Croxson and Ashton (1990), based on a retrospective non-randomised cohort, compared four alternative modes of management of ESRD: CAPD, hospital haemodialysis, home haemodialysis and renal transplantation. This study developed a mathematical Markov process (see Glossary) based on the data from 280 patients on dialysis and on Sesso, et al, 1990 Unmatched cohort of non-diabetic Brazil CAPD, hospital haemodialysis, patients transplantation Huraib, et al, 1990 Unmatched retrospective cohort Saudi Arabia CAPD and hospital haemodialysis Smith, et al, 1989 Matched prospective cohort Wales CAPD, hospital haemodialysis, home haemodialysis, subsidiary dialysis unit data extracted from the literature. The costs per patient per year of treatment were greatest for hospital haemodialysis, followed by home haemodialysis, renal transplantation and, finally, CAPD.…”

Section: Appendixmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Effectiveness and efficiency of methods of dialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease: systematic reviews.

MacLeod¹,

Grant²,

Donaldson³

et al. 1998

Health Technology Assessment

140

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Appendixmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Appendixmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Appendixmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effectiveness and efficiency of methods of dialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease: systematic reviews.

MacLeod¹,

Grant²,

Donaldson³

et al. 1998

Health Technology Assessment

140

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The infection rates 3 and comparison with hemodialysis (HD) have been published from our center. 4 However, we felt that non-peritonitis complications of this long-term procedure were not looked into carefully. Therefore, we retrospectively studied those complications which are being presented.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-Peritonitis Complications of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in Saudi Arabia

Huraib

Abu‐Aisha

Memon

et al. 1995

Annals of Saudi Medicine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although peritonitis is the major complication and leading cause of morbidity in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), there are other complications of this long-term renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality. In order to evaluate the non-peritonitis complications, we retrospectively studied 60 new patients who were accepted in our CAPD program over a period of eight years from 1984 to 1993. Out of the 60 patients, 31 were females and 29 were males, with a mean age of 37.0 ± 18 years. Tenckhoff s catheter was implanted by surgeons under direct vision in the operating theater through a midline incision. Nine of ourpatients had previous abdominal surgery and 11 females had pregnancies before CAPD, ranging from one to 10 with a mean of four. A total of 49 episodes of complications were observed, 32 early and 17 late. Early complications were defined if they occurred within three months from starting the procedure and late complications were defined as occurring after this period. There were 15 catheter blocks (25%), nine dialysate leaks (15%) and five hemoperitoneums (8.3%). Two serious and unusual complications were observed. In one of our patients, a mesenteric blood vessel injury occurred during catheter insertion, which necessitated massive blood transfusions and laparotomy. The other patient developed intestinal obstruction due to obstruction of intestinal loops around the catheter; this was corrected by removal of the catheter without the need for laparotomy. The late complications included six hernias, three hydroceles, three exit site infections, three tunnel infections and one case of loss of ultrafiltration. Ann Saudi Med 1995;15(5):458-461

show abstract

Comparison of Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis — a Cost–Utility Analysis

2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Our aim was to compare both health-related quality of life and costs for hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a defined population. Design Decision-tree modeling to estimate total costs and effects for two treatment strategies, HD and PD, among patients with chronic kidney failure, for 5 years following the start of treatment. Courses of events and health-care consumption were mapped in a retrospective matched-record study. Data on health status were obtained from a matched population by a quality-of-life questionnaire (EuroQol). The study has a societal perspective. Setting All dialysis departments in the southeastern health-care region of Sweden. Patients 136 patients with kidney failure, comprising 68 matched pairs, were included in a retrospective record study; 81 patients with kidney failure, comprising 27 matched triplets, were included in a prospective questionnaire study. Main Outcome Measures Cost per life year and cost per quality-adjusted life year. Results The cost per quality-adjusted life year for PD was lower in all analyzed age groups. There was a 12% difference in the age group 21 – 40 years, a 31% difference in the age group 41 – 60 years, and an 11% difference in the age group 61+ years. Peritoneal dialysis and HD resulted in similar frequencies of transplantation (50% and 41%, respectively) and expected survival (3.58 years and 3.56 years, respectively) during the first 5 years after the initiation of treatment. Conclusion The cost–utility ratio is most favorable for PD as the primary method of treatment for patients eligible for both PD and HD.

show abstract

Comparison Between Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and in Center Hemodialysis

Cited by 4 publications

References 10 publications

Effectiveness and efficiency of methods of dialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease: systematic reviews.

Effectiveness and efficiency of methods of dialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease: systematic reviews.

Non-Peritonitis Complications of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in Saudi Arabia

Comparison of Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis — a Cost–Utility Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About