“…Since 1992, new RFA electrodes with ingenious designs (wet, cooled, expandable, bipolar, cooled-wet) and combinations of these designs [7], more powerful generators [8] and improved treatment protocols such as pulsed RFA [9], stepwise deployment of expandable electrodes [10], stepwise increase of current [11,12] and rapid switching between multiple electrodes [13] have been introduced to successfully increase mean ablation diameter, butunfortunately attention to improve predictability of the size and the shape of the ablation zone has lagged behind. Ablation zones are often smaller or larger than expected and less symmetrical, less spherical and less regular than desired [12,. A standard deviation of the ablation diameter, especially the transverse diameter, of 0.5 -1 cm is very common [51].…”