2020 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icimcis51567.2020.9354324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Faster R-CNN and CNN in Recognizing Weaving Patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, investigation on the detection of Malay woven fabrics utilized the faster R-CNN method. This study did not optimize Faster R-CNN, so this method's performance was only 82.14% [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, investigation on the detection of Malay woven fabrics utilized the faster R-CNN method. This study did not optimize Faster R-CNN, so this method's performance was only 82.14% [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Faster R-CNN and some other convolutional neural networks were considered for the recognition of traditional handicraft weaving patterns. The results of the study showed that the accuracy of Faster R-CNN reached 82.14% [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%