Comparison between laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy for the treatment of acute ruptured ectopic pregnancy

Zhou, Miao

doi:10.12980/jad.6.2017jadweb-2017-0002

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Due to different inclusion criteria after the full-text revision, 33 papers were excluded, and 12 were included for data extraction (Table 1). Included studies were published from 2005 till 2022 and patients were recruited from India, turkey, China, South Africa, Nepal, Canada, Ireland, Jordan and also other countries [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The results which reported in these collected studies stated that if all surgical units have limited access surgery experience, more ectopic pregnancies can be managed laparoscopically.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The hispanic women, women who paid for their own medical care and women with private insurance, like to undergo open laparotomy operations [12]. Significantly decreased serum levels of NE, E, ACTH, Cor, INS, PRA, AngII, and ALD were found in the laparoscopy group compared to the laparotomy group but the need of blood transfusions is significantly more in the laparotomy than the laparoscopy [15,16,24]. In comparison to the Laparoscopy group, the laparotomy group contained noticeably more women with BMI >30 kg/m2 [20].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Laparoscopy versus Laparotomy in the Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Integrative Literature Review

Bisharah¹,

Alrashidi

almilad

et al. 2022

SMHJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a common gynecological emergency in resource-limited countries, where laparotomy is the conventional therapy despite the fact that laparoscopic surgery is considered the best option. There is a lack of prospective randomized evidence comparing laparoscopic surgery with laparotomy in the surgical care of women with REP. Objectives: To summarize current evidences comparing laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Methodology: PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library were utilized to identify the articles. In the current review, all pertinent articles related to both our topic and other articles were used. Other articles not related to the objective of the review were excluded. The research team looked through a standardized format in which the data had been extracted. Results: According to PRSIMA guidelines, our study included 13 published studies that were registered to extract final data from a total of 110 studies found after searching the mentioned databases, which were then used for title screening. Some were excluded from screening of abstracts and others due to different inclusion criteria, after full-text review. These 13 studies were used to compare laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the surgical management of EP, establishing that laparoscopic treatment of EP may be the most beneficial method with the highest level of safety and efficacy. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly being used as the method of choice for treating EPs. When compared to laparotomy, laparoscopic treatment for EP raises concerns about safety, viability and results in fewer postoperative adhesions. Laparoscopy is also more practicable and proven to be more efficient in terms of blood loss, requirement for blood transfusion, need for analgesia, and time of postoperative hospital stay.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Laparoscopy versus Laparotomy in the Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Integrative Literature Review

Bisharah¹,

Alrashidi

almilad

et al. 2022

SMHJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Patients with hemodynamic instability were more likely to undergo laparotomy in retrospective analysis of single cohort studies [15,16]. Over the last twenty years, laparoscopic treatment has increased in popularity as the surgical method for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States [17][18][19][20]. Between 1995 and 2005, a single institution study showed increase in laparoscopy surgery from 40% to 86%, indicating the shift towards minimally invasive procedures particularly at academic institutions [21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socioeconomic Analysis of the Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancies: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

Malhotra

Patel

GILL

et al. 2022

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

show abstract

Comparison between laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy for the treatment of acute ruptured ectopic pregnancy

Cited by 2 publications

References 18 publications

Laparoscopy versus Laparotomy in the Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Integrative Literature Review

Laparoscopy versus Laparotomy in the Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Integrative Literature Review

Socioeconomic Analysis of the Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancies: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About