2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between monofilament and multifilament polypropylene tapes in urinary incontinence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
20
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The IVS posterior showed good results but carries the risk of mesh erosion. Perhaps a monofilament polypropylene mesh, which was shown to be superior to the multifilament mesh in urinary incontinence surgery with regard to erosion rates, will reduce the risk of erosion in posterior intravaginal slingplasty [63] although Sivaslioglu et al recently showed that these erosions might be technique related [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IVS posterior showed good results but carries the risk of mesh erosion. Perhaps a monofilament polypropylene mesh, which was shown to be superior to the multifilament mesh in urinary incontinence surgery with regard to erosion rates, will reduce the risk of erosion in posterior intravaginal slingplasty [63] although Sivaslioglu et al recently showed that these erosions might be technique related [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infective complications are known to occur with an IVS [4]. Cutaneous sinus to the retropubic space and vesico-vaginal fistula have been described with both types of tape [4,5], and a thigh abscess was reported after a transobturator tape [6]. There is also a reported case of ischiorectal abscess formation after a transobturator tape [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Bafghi et al [8] also performed a non-randomized, homocentric retrospective questionnaire study comparing TVT to IVS including 137 TVT patients and 119 IVS patients. Patient satisfaction was 88.3% for the TVT operation and only 73.5% for the IVS operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TVT tape is a macroporous monofilament tape whereas the IVS tape is a multifilament tape with small pores. Previous studies have shown a higher incidence of erosion and extrusion with the IVS tape [3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%