01.01 - Clinical Problems - No Related to Asthma or COPD 2022
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.1794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between suspected and confirmed COVID-19 respiratory patients: a pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5] Nasalpharyngeal swab with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase (PCR), is considered as the gold standard for the diagnosis of Covid-19 but there are some difficulties related to the procedure which may postpone it. [6] The sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR test have been discussed in several studies; Dramé et al [7], found that, the sensitivity of nasal-pharyngeal swab (NPS) was below 40% and suggested performing NPSs repeatedly over time. Moreover, Xiang et al considered the SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests IgM as well as IgG as a better diagnostic investigation than the NPS [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Nasalpharyngeal swab with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase (PCR), is considered as the gold standard for the diagnosis of Covid-19 but there are some difficulties related to the procedure which may postpone it. [6] The sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR test have been discussed in several studies; Dramé et al [7], found that, the sensitivity of nasal-pharyngeal swab (NPS) was below 40% and suggested performing NPSs repeatedly over time. Moreover, Xiang et al considered the SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests IgM as well as IgG as a better diagnostic investigation than the NPS [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%