1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)85064-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of a conventional extractor with two unconventional extractors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The synthesis of the bonded phases was carried out in refluxing hexadecane under nitrogen as described earlier for CW-20M (4), followed by exhaustive extraction with methanol in a high-speed apparatus (72). Unless otherwise noted, Surfynol was added at 6 weight% load to Chromosorb and at 60% load to the other supports.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synthesis of the bonded phases was carried out in refluxing hexadecane under nitrogen as described earlier for CW-20M (4), followed by exhaustive extraction with methanol in a high-speed apparatus (72). Unless otherwise noted, Surfynol was added at 6 weight% load to Chromosorb and at 60% load to the other supports.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%