2003
DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.81.623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of a Split-window and a Multi-spectral Cloud Classification for MODIS Observations

Abstract: Results of the split-window cloud retrieval method and the new Meteosat Second Generation cloud analysis method (MSG/CLA), have been compared for MODIS data over the west Atlantic Ocean. Very good agreement is obtained for the classification of optically thick ice and water clouds. Differences are found for thin cirrus, thin water clouds and at cloud edges. These differences are explained by the fact that MSG/CLA also uses spectral channels of 3.9, 6.2, and 8.7 mm in addition to the split-window, which provide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The APICS cloud masking algorithm has inherited its structure from the EUMETSAT scenes detection algorithm (Lutz, 1999(Lutz, , 2002Lutz et al, 2003). It is based on six groups of threshold tests applied to several SEVIRI channels.…”
Section: Cloud Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The APICS cloud masking algorithm has inherited its structure from the EUMETSAT scenes detection algorithm (Lutz, 1999(Lutz, , 2002Lutz et al, 2003). It is based on six groups of threshold tests applied to several SEVIRI channels.…”
Section: Cloud Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the technique is to classify optically thin cirrus type cloud without using visible data. The classifications produced reliable results in representing highlevel clouds in comparison with conventional schemes (Lutz et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The DT WV7.3-IR12.0 is effective in distinguishing between high-level and low-level/mid-level clouds (Lutz et al 2003). The 7.3-lm channel is dominated by atmospheric water vapor absorption.…”
Section: Parameters For Identification Of Raining Pixelsmentioning
confidence: 99%