1994
DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199403000-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of activity levels using the Caltrac?? accelerometer and five questionnaires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
188
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
188
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite previous research demonstrating that self-report measures can be a valid and reliable means of measuring exercise behaviour (Miller, Freedson & Kline, 1994), future research would benefit from including a more objective measure of exercise. Moreover, although common amongst self-affirmation research, it is notable that students were over-represented in the current sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite previous research demonstrating that self-report measures can be a valid and reliable means of measuring exercise behaviour (Miller, Freedson & Kline, 1994), future research would benefit from including a more objective measure of exercise. Moreover, although common amongst self-affirmation research, it is notable that students were over-represented in the current sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exercise behaviour was measured using self-report measures. Even though it has been demonstrated that such measures are valid (e.g., Miller, Freedson & Kline, 1994) future research should nevertheless aim to replicate the findings employing more objective measures of exercise. Furthermore, common with much other self-affirmation research, students were over-represented in the current study, limiting the generalisation of findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, although evidence exists that self-reports of physical activity and interdental hygiene are valid (e.g. Miller, Freedson, & Kline, 1994;Schu¨z et al, 2006;, objective measures of the dependent variables are desirable. Fourth, the cross-sectional measurement of intentions and planning does not allow strong inferences for cause-and-effect relations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test-retest reliability over 2 weeks was reported to be .74 [34]. Construct validity was indicated through strong correlations reported with both accelerometer and VO 2max measurements [35,36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%