2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00551-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of alternative modelling approaches for groundwater flow in fractured rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
68
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of different model conceptualisations may be evaluated by having alternative conceptual models based on different geological interpretations (Selroos et al, 2001;National Research Council, 2001). Harrar et al (2003) and Højberg and Refsgaard (2005) present two different examples, both using three different conceptual models, based on three alternative geological interpretations for multi-aquifer system representative of eastern part of Denmark with glacial till plains (Højberg and Refsgaard, 2005) and in sandy outwash plains in the western part of Denmark (Harrar et al, 2003).…”
Section: What Is a Hydrogeological Conceptual Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of different model conceptualisations may be evaluated by having alternative conceptual models based on different geological interpretations (Selroos et al, 2001;National Research Council, 2001). Harrar et al (2003) and Højberg and Refsgaard (2005) present two different examples, both using three different conceptual models, based on three alternative geological interpretations for multi-aquifer system representative of eastern part of Denmark with glacial till plains (Højberg and Refsgaard, 2005) and in sandy outwash plains in the western part of Denmark (Harrar et al, 2003).…”
Section: What Is a Hydrogeological Conceptual Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choice of model type Studies of flow in fractured crystalline rocks have employed a wide variety of different conceptual and numerical models (Selroos et al 2002). Apart from porous medium and discrete fracture network models, lattice network models have sometimes been used to understand flow and solute transport behaviour in three dimensions.…”
Section: A Novel Lattice Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small networks usually comprise one to ten joints, so the application of a deterministic method is feasible, in which the position of joints is known (e.g. Tezuka & Watanabe 2000;Selroos et al 2002). In the case of larger networks, a hundred or more joints are considered, which may be generated using a stochastic approach (e.g.…”
Section: Models Of Impermeable Matrix and The Discrete Joint Network mentioning
confidence: 99%