2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(03)00075-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of analytical methods for the evaluation of antibody responses against epitopes of polymorphic protein antigens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore not unlikely that removing a flexible hydrophobic moiety at the apex of the 2F5 antigen binding site would cause artifacts in apparent binding affinity for the gp41 epitope bound to the solid phase. In contrast, in a competitive ELISA, the free antibody available for binding to the adsorbed antigen is determined by the binding constant of the antibody to the competitor in solution (20). This allows for a more accurate comparison of the relative binding affinities of antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore not unlikely that removing a flexible hydrophobic moiety at the apex of the 2F5 antigen binding site would cause artifacts in apparent binding affinity for the gp41 epitope bound to the solid phase. In contrast, in a competitive ELISA, the free antibody available for binding to the adsorbed antigen is determined by the binding constant of the antibody to the competitor in solution (20). This allows for a more accurate comparison of the relative binding affinities of antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After place exchange, the resulting particles were characterized by NMR to determine the degree of functionalization. Place exchange involving a 5:1 tiopronin to incoming peptide ratio resulted in approximate final average compositions of Au 616 Tiopronin 183 Ebola-l 12 [24][25][26] This study relied upon a QCM to quantitatively determine the binding between the monoclonal antibody and our nanocluster mimic. QCM operates via an oscillating quartz crystal that measures mass adsorption due to a change in oscillation frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rate of anti-STARP seropositivity in patients with acute falciparum malaria seems to be higher than that of anti-CSP seropositivity because only 16% of P. falciparum-infected patients gave positive results based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunofluorescent antibody test (IFA) (Tapchaisri et al 1983). Although different analytical methods could result in different rates of immunoreactivity to malarial polymorphic epitopes, both IFA and Western blotting analysis seem not to be compromised by antibody binding avidity to the variant sequences (Helg et al 2003). Therefore, it is unlikely that the non-reactive sera to recombinant STARP in this study would be due to the presence of STARP variants in P. falciparum population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%