1995
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.74.1.84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of automatic QT measurement techniques in the normal 12 lead electrocardiogram.

Abstract: Different QT measurement techniques produced results which were influenced, to varying degrees, by filtering and technique variables. This is relevant for the inter-comparison of studies using different techniques. Technique TH, a common approach, is not recommended.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Templates representing the average PQRST complex in the segments were generated. The end of the T wave (T end ) in each template was determined automatically using the slope intersect method [17]. The QT interval was calculated as the time from the beginning of the Q wave to T end in each template.…”
Section: Ecg Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Templates representing the average PQRST complex in the segments were generated. The end of the T wave (T end ) in each template was determined automatically using the slope intersect method [17]. The QT interval was calculated as the time from the beginning of the Q wave to T end in each template.…”
Section: Ecg Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QT interval was defined as the onset of QRS to the point of return of the T wave to the isoelectric line using the maximum slope technique. The QT interval was measured in all leads where the terminal segment of the T wave was clearly demarcated (11), with the longest interval in any lead used as the representative QT interval. The RR interval was calculated from the preceding two consecutive R waves.…”
Section: Ecg Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В современных системах ХМ для автоматического анализа интервала QT используется несколько методов определения окончания Т зубца [69]. Интервала QT у здоровых пациентов, опреде-ленный пороговым методом, практически не отлича-лись от значений QT, измеренных вручную [70,71]. У больных с сердечно-сосудистой патологией, приво- [73], где автоматический анализ интервала QT проводился у 40 молодых людей в возрасте 28±9 лет парабаличе-ским методом, были получены QTср 343±24 мсек у мужчин и 343±23 мсек для женщин, QTс составил 400±20 мсек для мужчин и 420±17 мсек для женщин, а QTр ср.…”
Section: оценка интервала Qt при хмunclassified