2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-5538-9_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Automatic Speech Recognition Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimistic interpretation regarding accuracy would be that ASR performance is nowadays performing well in different locations and social contexts. This is in line with current ASR research that reports sinking WER rates in various conditions and languages due to training effects (Kim et al 2019;Proksch, Wratil, and Wäckerle 2019;Tancoigne et al 2022). The more pessimistic interpretation would be that situations might be more complex than assumed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The optimistic interpretation regarding accuracy would be that ASR performance is nowadays performing well in different locations and social contexts. This is in line with current ASR research that reports sinking WER rates in various conditions and languages due to training effects (Kim et al 2019;Proksch, Wratil, and Wäckerle 2019;Tancoigne et al 2022). The more pessimistic interpretation would be that situations might be more complex than assumed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although this is contrary to previous research (Garnerin, Rossato, and Besacier 2003;Pellegrini et al 2012), this is good news because we did not find evidence for bias in the ASR transcriptions for these subgroups. The likely explanation for our null findings is that the performance of ASR systems improved since previous research has been conducted (Kim et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 3 YouTube transcript service has shown the lowest Word Error rate ( Kim et al, 2019 ). To validate this, two of the researchers independently watched the videos and extracted the expressions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%