2019
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2019.2922321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Bingham Filter and Extended Kalman Filter in IMU Attitude Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further improve the accuracy of pose estimation, studies focusing on enhancing classical pose estimation algorithms and considering sensor characteristics [22][23][24][25] have yielded promising results. In addition, introducing new sensors for specific application scenarios can improve estimation accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further improve the accuracy of pose estimation, studies focusing on enhancing classical pose estimation algorithms and considering sensor characteristics [22][23][24][25] have yielded promising results. In addition, introducing new sensors for specific application scenarios can improve estimation accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In AHRS, the reference vectors, namely Earth's gravity, and the Earth's magnetic field are derived from accelerometer and magnetometer measurements. The vectors are then fused to correct the attitude errors accumulated from integration of noisy gyroscope measurements, where sensor fusion methods such as complementary filters (Mahony et al, 2008, Fourati et al, 2010, Wu et al, 2016, Kalman filters (Marins et al, 2001, Crassidis et al, 2007, Del Rosario et al, 2018 or recent Bingham filter (Gilitschenski et al, 2015, Wang andAdamczyk, 2019) are usually employed. Most works assume that the body's acceleration is negligible and there is little electromagnetic interference that perturbs the measurable geomagnetic field (Del Rosario et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetometer is usually not required for the inclinometer because the magnetic data is used for heading estimation. Meanwhile, acceleration and angular rates are necessary for the tilt calculation [26]. Practically, many inclinometer companies have been demanding an effective filter for only accelerometer without the support from other sensors because of economic concern when numerous inclinometers are in production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%