2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of commonly used primer sets for evaluating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities: Is there a universal solution?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
104
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
5
104
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…(VTX00064). This result would seem to indicate that the two pairs of primers cover different taxa, and it offers an indication of the AMF community that lives in a truffle-ground, but it also reveals, as recently pointed out by Kohout et al (2014), that it is difficult to amplify AMF communities with the common primer pair and that bias appears. In spite of this, discrepancy was here observed between the number of clones that were sequenced and that of the effective Glomeromycota sequences that were obtained, irrespectively of what pair of primers was used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…(VTX00064). This result would seem to indicate that the two pairs of primers cover different taxa, and it offers an indication of the AMF community that lives in a truffle-ground, but it also reveals, as recently pointed out by Kohout et al (2014), that it is difficult to amplify AMF communities with the common primer pair and that bias appears. In spite of this, discrepancy was here observed between the number of clones that were sequenced and that of the effective Glomeromycota sequences that were obtained, irrespectively of what pair of primers was used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This approach yielded an estimate of 34 AMF taxa detected in roots on the basis of SSU-DGGE banding that has been shown, via individual band sub-cloning and sequencing, to underestimate AMF diversity (Öpik et al 2003), although it assumes we did not have any nonspecific amplification from other fungal phyla (see Kohout et al 2014). The clearest relationship between soil nutrients and AMF taxa representation was seen for soil N. A related study in species rich tropical montane forest found reduced AMF species richness in bulked root samples in response to N and P addition (Camenzind et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some primer combinations discriminate against certain AMF lineages (Gamper et al 2009), while others result in high non-specific amplification (Alguacil et al 2009). The region that we amplified in the first PCR offers species resolution power (Stockinger et al 2010) and the primers used (Krüger et al 2009) allow the widest taxon coverage compared to other commonly used primers targeting a single nuclear rDNA marker (Kohout et al 2014). It may be mentioned that Kohout et al (2014) reported chimera formation when using these primers.…”
Section: Taxonomic Coverage and Species Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSU-ITS-LSU rRNA gene region used was defined as an extended DNA barcode resolving closely related AMF species (Stockinger et al 2010;Schoch et al 2012). Importantly, it can be amplified from field samples using AMF specific PCR primers (Krüger et al 2009), which recently were confirmed to have the broadest taxonomic coverage among other PCR primers frequently applied for AMF detection (Kohout et al 2014). The primers amplify approx.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%