2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/etfa.2017.8247619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of deep neural network architectures for fault detection in Tennessee Eastman process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a review by [ 25 ], several other applications of FDI to the TEP were also presented. Recently, machine learning (ML/AI) approaches have also been applied to the TEP [ 26 ], including deep learning approaches [ 27 ]. Hybrid techniques, such as those of [ 17 ], have also been successfully applied to the TEP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review by [ 25 ], several other applications of FDI to the TEP were also presented. Recently, machine learning (ML/AI) approaches have also been applied to the TEP [ 26 ], including deep learning approaches [ 27 ]. Hybrid techniques, such as those of [ 17 ], have also been successfully applied to the TEP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a fair comparison between the methods, for studies where only non-incipient faults were considered the results were compared to fault detection results obtained from the first level of the hierarchical structure model whereas for studies where all the faults were considered, the comparisons were done for results obtained from second level of the hierarchical structure model. The fault detection rate (FDR) for all the faults is compared in Table 5 for the proposed method, PCA [35], DPCA [35], ICA [23], Convolutional NN (CNN) [45], Deep Stacked Network (DSN) [7], Stacked Autoencoder (SAE) [7], Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) [46] and One-Class SVM (OCSVM) [46]. The fault detection rates for all non-incipient faults and 4 and 5 respectively for different methodologies along with the results from the proposed method.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Hotelling's T 2 , generally, the mean matrix and the covariance matrix change two essential factors representing the process change from the normal situation to some fault situation [27]. There are two portions of the result in each variable's contribution to the process change.…”
Section: B Fault Diagnosis Using the Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to identify new faults from the known ones, the F direction, which is based on partial F-values with the cumulative percent variation (CPV), is introduced. While the conventional approach based on partial F-values works well in detecting faults in most cases [27]- [30], it still suffers from irrelevant variables and low computation efficiency [31]- [36]. In this paper, the CPV, based on the equivalent variation of each variable, is proposed to determine candidate variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%