2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of detailing methods for straight skewed steel I-girder bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent study has shown that the lack-of-fit effects for the TDL fit detailing method at the SDL stage are equal and opposite to the lack-of-fit effects for the SDL fit detailing method at the TDL stage (Gull et al, 2017;Gull, 2014). Lack-of-fit effects for the SDL fit detailing method at the TDL stage can be obtained from grid analysis and reversing their sign shall give the lack-of-fit effects for the TDL fit detailing method at the SDL stage.…”
Section: Reversing 2d Ga Results For the Sdl Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent study has shown that the lack-of-fit effects for the TDL fit detailing method at the SDL stage are equal and opposite to the lack-of-fit effects for the SDL fit detailing method at the TDL stage (Gull et al, 2017;Gull, 2014). Lack-of-fit effects for the SDL fit detailing method at the TDL stage can be obtained from grid analysis and reversing their sign shall give the lack-of-fit effects for the TDL fit detailing method at the SDL stage.…”
Section: Reversing 2d Ga Results For the Sdl Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that Δ is obtained from the concrete dead load camber calculated from deflection of the system of girders and cross-frames attached together in NCHRP 725 (White et al, 2012). This is an incorrect way of calculating Δ for the TDL fit detailing method at the SDL stage as explained elsewhere (Gull et al, 2017;Gull, 2014).…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature on the interaction of component beams in grillages or similar structures (e.g., system of beams braced against torsion) focuses on, among others, (1) lateral torsional buckling of I-girders discretely braced against torsion and/or against translation [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], including lateral torsional buckling of beams with point bracing [ 20 , 21 ], (2) the numerical analysis of two- and four-beam structural systems transversely braced with coupling beams [ 22 ], (3) the assembly of beam systems in skewed bridge structures [ 23 ], (4) global stability loss in two-beam systems (beams connected by cross-frames) [ 24 , 25 ], (5) modelling of curvilinear composite bridges, in which the grillage structure made of full-wall I-beam girders was approximated by an equivalent 3D truss model [ 26 ], (6) taking into account, in the global analysis, the actual stiffness of the component beam joints (stringer-to-crossbeam) of the deck members of old railway bridges [ 27 ]. A considerable number of studies are available in the technical literature that deal with various grillage systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%