2005
DOI: 10.5414/cnp64205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different methods for hemodialysis evaluation by means of ROC curves: from artificial intelligence to current methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In each step sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) were calculated according to the BCM classification. The Se-Sp pair achieving the smaller distance to the optimal point (Sp = 100%, Se = 100%) was chosen as the optimal cut-off for this variable [ 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each step sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) were calculated according to the BCM classification. The Se-Sp pair achieving the smaller distance to the optimal point (Sp = 100%, Se = 100%) was chosen as the optimal cut-off for this variable [ 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12]14 In this context, we demonstrate that the PLS-based model can provide a reliable estimate of the equilibrated urea, which in turn could be used in dose adequacy evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset used for modeling consisted of 766,000 records, each representing a dialysis session recorded in the Spanish NephroCare centers. NN proved to be a better predictor than a standard recommendation from the guidelines regarding the urea removal ratio, postdialysis BUN, or Kt/V [19]. ML algorithms were used to predict low blood pressure [20], blood volume [21,22], or TBW [23].…”
Section: Biomed Research Internationalmentioning
confidence: 99%