2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00961-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different sampling techniques for the evaluation of pesticide spray drift in apple orchards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean recovery percentages were (95 ± 11) %, (89 ± 6) % and (85 ± 15) % for GFF, XAD-2 and XAD-4, respectively. These values were better than the ones obtained by Superpack 2 resin plus glass wool cartridge extracted with n-hexane/diethyl ether (90:10) for different pesticides [20]. For the same cartridges but with other elution solvents (acetone or ethyl acetate), comparable values were obtained for malathion, the only common pesticide [17].…”
Section: Selection Of Solid Sorbent and Solvent Elutionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mean recovery percentages were (95 ± 11) %, (89 ± 6) % and (85 ± 15) % for GFF, XAD-2 and XAD-4, respectively. These values were better than the ones obtained by Superpack 2 resin plus glass wool cartridge extracted with n-hexane/diethyl ether (90:10) for different pesticides [20]. For the same cartridges but with other elution solvents (acetone or ethyl acetate), comparable values were obtained for malathion, the only common pesticide [17].…”
Section: Selection Of Solid Sorbent and Solvent Elutionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Good resolution of peaks and proper relative standard deviation of retention times were found (less than 2%). Since several sensitive operational protocols has been proposed for pesticide determination [17][18][19][20], the injection in split 1:20 and splitless and the acquisition in SCAN and SIM modes were compared. The instrumental sensitivity, or minimum detectable amount value, was calculated as three times the standard deviation of the chromatographic noise from injecting pure isooctane (Table 2A).…”
Section: Chromatographic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A deposition profile was observed for the sampling period between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. These gradients were successfully used to determine volatilisation fluxes from the treated parcel, and microclimatic factors were used to explain these observations [52].…”
Section: Recoveries and Methods Detection Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, droplet size depends on operating pressure and nozzle type. Though a large number of models offering various levels of performance are available on the market, many growers base their choices more on economic considerations than on any knowledge of the nozzles' actual technical characteristics (Derksen & Sanderson, 1996) (Briand et al, 2002) (Ade et al, 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%